Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Washington

Regency Care Center at Monroe

Monroe, WA · ~108 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
22.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Regency Care Center at Monroe runs at 338% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade F.

Regency Care Center at Monroe: 22.0 TCR = 338% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Regency Care Center at Monroe safety composite

Regency Care Center at Monroe scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 21.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 42.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Regency Care Center at Monroe: 8.1 → 47.9 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 47.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.96× in 2023

Regency Care Center at Monroe's TCR rose 39.8 from 8.1 in 2021 to 47.9 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.96× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Monroe, WA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 22.0 · 338% of ind

  • DART 43.0 DART
  • RANK #176/190
  • PHOTO Aperion Care Plum Gr…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~108 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Aperion Care Plum Grove (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Regency Care Center at Monroe in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Regency Care Center at Monroe averages 22.0 TCR (338% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Regency Care Center at Monroe TCR series: 2021=8.1 · 2022=9.9 · 2023=47.9 · BLS 6.5

Where Regency Care Center at Monroe falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #176 safest of 190 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Washington.

Regency Care Center at Monroe (108 employees, TCR 22.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Regency Care Center at Monroe
Regency Care Center at Monroe (108 employees, TCR 22.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Regency Care Center at Monroe has more employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 47.9 43.0 8 31 0
2022 9.9 7.1 7 0 0
2021 8.1 8.1 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · WA · Monroe

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 48 employers in Monroe, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Aperion Care Plum Grove 22.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Birmingham Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC 21.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pleasant Hill Health and Rehabilitation Center 22.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Columbus Healthcare Center 22.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE C&C Logging LLC 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE Longview Export Yard 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shamrock Traffic 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE TapaniPlumbing Inc. 108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Canyon Creek Cabinet Company 353 FTE
CITY-NEAR Headquarters 344 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5628 306 FTE
CITY-NEAR 701-00210 295 FTE
NAT-TCR Swanson Bros Lumber Co., Inc 22.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Princeton 22.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CHS - Ground Ops 22.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sna-Ground Ops 22.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 55459 OmniTrans 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corpus Christi Service Center 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Broadview Heights 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Steel Technologies Mishawaka 108 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.