Concrete paving, residential and commercial driveway and parking area · California

Regency Concrete, Inc.

Long Beach, CA · ~17 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Regency Concrete, Inc. runs at 425% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Concrete paving, residential and commercial driveway and parking area workplace, earning a grade F.

Regency Concrete, Inc.: 11.9 TCR = 425% of Concrete paving, residential and commercial driveway and parking area BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Regency Concrete, Inc. safety composite

Regency Concrete, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.4

2021→2024

Regency Concrete, Inc. injury rate improved

Regency Concrete, Inc.'s TCR fell 11.4 from 21.1 in 2021 to 9.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 21.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=21.1 · 2022=16.7 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=9.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Long Beach, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.9 · 425% of ind

  • DART 4.9 DART
  • RANK #163/171
  • PHOTO Tim N. Jones Concret…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~17 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tim N. Jones Concrete & Masonry, Inc. (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Regency Concrete, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Regency Concrete, Inc. averages 11.9 TCR (425% of the Concrete paving, residential and commercial driveway and parking area BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Regency Concrete, Inc. TCR series: 2021=21.1 · 2022=16.7 · 2023=0 · 2024=9.7 · BLS 2.8

Where Regency Concrete, Inc. falls in its industry

1,634 Concrete paving, residential a establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #163 safest of 171 Concrete paving, residential a employers in California.

Regency Concrete, Inc. (17 employees, TCR 11.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Regency Concrete, Inc.
Regency Concrete, Inc. (17 employees, TCR 11.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Regency Concrete, Inc. has fewer employees than the Concrete paving, residential and commerc median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.7 4.9 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 16.7 16.7 3 0 0
2021 21.1 21.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · CA · Long Beach

1,634 Concrete paving, residential and commercial driveway and parking area employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 614 employers in Long Beach, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tim N. Jones Concrete & Masonry, Inc. 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Millcreek Construction Group, Inc. 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dependable Fence & Welding INC 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pool Surfacing 2000 12.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE HM Clause - Dixon Research Station 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE Laub Ranches Inc 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sherwood Equipment Inc 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barton Ranch, Inc. 17 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorialcare Long Beach Medical Center 3,755 FTE
CITY-NEAR LBM00 LONG BEACH MEMORIAL MED CENTER 3,552 FTE
CITY-NEAR Total Terminals International, LLC. 2,683 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 300 2,621 FTE
NAT-TCR Stephens Landscaping 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Pulaski Middle School 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Whitaker School 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Galaxy Uptown LLC 11.9 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.