Skilled nursing facilities · Connecticut

Regency House of Wallingford

Wallingford, CT · ~166 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Regency House of Wallingford runs at 231% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Regency House of Wallingford: 15.0 TCR = 231% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Regency House of Wallingford safety composite

Regency House of Wallingford scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 14.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Regency House of Wallingford: 11.4 → 58.9 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 58.9 TCR · DART/TCR 3.8× in 2022

Regency House of Wallingford's TCR rose 47.5 from 11.4 in 2016 to 58.9 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 3.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Wallingford, CT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 15.0 · 231% of ind

  • DART 57.1 DART
  • RANK #197/258
  • PHOTO SCNC, Inc. dba Sprin…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 89 inj
  • SIZE ~166 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SCNC, Inc. dba Spring Creek Health & Rehab (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Regency House of Wallingford in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Regency House of Wallingford averages 15.0 TCR (231% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Regency House of Wallingford TCR series: 2016=11.4 · 2017=5.9 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=14.9 · 2020=36.1 · 2021=16.6 · 2022=58.9 · BLS 6.5

Where Regency House of Wallingford falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #197 safest of 258 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Connecticut.

Regency House of Wallingford (166 employees, TCR 15.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Regency House of Wallingford
Regency House of Wallingford (166 employees, TCR 15.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Regency House of Wallingford has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 58.9 57.1 17 51 0
2021 16.6 15.0 15 5 0
2020 36.1 36.1 12 35 0
2019 14.9 12.7 20 0 0
2018 5.2 4.5 7 0 0
2017 5.9 5.2 8 0 0
2016 11.4 10.2 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CT · Wallingford

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 136 employers in Wallingford, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SCNC, Inc. dba Spring Creek Health & Rehab 15.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Medilodge of Clare 15.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Complete care Hillside 15.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Frazee Care Center 15.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Massey's Plate Glass and Aluminum 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE PEZ Manufacturing Corp. 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE PCC Structurals Groton 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE Engineered Materials : North Haven 166 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon Transportation Services : BDL5 1,386 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gaylord Hopital 986 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BDL5 956 FTE
CITY-NEAR DDS South Region 606 FTE
NAT-TCR Eliabeth Melendez 15.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 283610-Haz-Maryland Heights Br 15.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 354662-Levittown Po 15.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Distinguished Images 15.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Greater Orange County 43110 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hackney 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hobbs Bonded Fibers NA LLC 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sanctuary at Holy Cross 166 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.