Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Wisconsin

Regency Senior Communities Muskego

Muskego, WI · ~76 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Regency Senior Communities Muskego runs at 108% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Regency Senior Communities Muskego: 4.1 TCR = 108% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Regency Senior Communities Muskego safety composite

Regency Senior Communities Muskego scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 4.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Regency Senior Communities Muskego: 2.3 → 6.5 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 11.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.52× in 2021

Regency Senior Communities Muskego's TCR rose 4.2 from 2.3 in 2016 to 6.5 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 11.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Muskego, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.1 · 108% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #53/171
  • PHOTO Edelweiss Village
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~76 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Edelweiss Village (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Regency Senior Communities Muskego in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Regency Senior Communities Muskego averages 4.1 TCR (108% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Regency Senior Communities Muskego TCR series: 2016=2.3 · 2017=0 · 2018=11.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=6.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Regency Senior Communities Muskego falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #53 safest of 171 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Wisconsin.

Regency Senior Communities Muskego (76 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Regency Senior Communities Muskego
Regency Senior Communities Muskego (76 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Regency Senior Communities Muskego has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 6.5 2.1 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 11.8 4.7 5 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.3 2.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · WI · Muskego

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 42 employers in Muskego, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Edelweiss Village 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Village Shalom, Inc. 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR TOWNE CENTRE 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR St. Paul's Home 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Creekwood Complex 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Site Bulk Material Handling 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Genoa #3 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE KEWAUNEE 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR Inpro Corporation - World Headquarters 540 FTE
CITY-NEAR HSL 16, LLC 332 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4677 289 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4677 287 FTE
NAT-TCR APP Portland 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Timmons Construction Inc. 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Madison Parish Hospital 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sabert Corporation Kentucky 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE FESCO 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Park Terrace Village 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shiner Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clark Rehabilitation & Skilled Nursing 76 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.