Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers · Arizona

Regency Technologies - Phoenix

Phoenix, AZ · ~52 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Regency Technologies - Phoenix runs at 253% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Regency Technologies - Phoenix: 5.6 TCR = 253% of Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Regency Technologies - Phoenix safety composite

Regency Technologies - Phoenix scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Regency Technologies - Phoenix held a steady TCR band

Regency Technologies - Phoenix's TCR held near 0.1 from 3.3 in 2017 to 3.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 17.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.3 · 2018=17.1 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=6.2 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423930 · Phoenix, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.6 · 253% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #12/19
  • PHOTO Mercer Company
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mercer Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Regency Technologies - Phoenix in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Regency Technologies - Phoenix averages 5.6 TCR (253% of the Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Regency Technologies - Phoenix TCR series: 2017=3.3 · 2018=17.1 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=6.2 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=3.3 · BLS 2.2

Where Regency Technologies - Phoenix falls in its industry

1,126 Recyclable materials (e.g., gl establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 19 Recyclable materials (e.g., gl employers in Arizona.

Regency Technologies - Phoenix (52 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Regency Technologies - Phoenix
Regency Technologies - Phoenix (52 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Regency Technologies - Phoenix has more employees than the Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.3 3.3 2 0 0
2023 3.8 3.8 2 0 0
2022 3.6 1.8 2 0 0
2021 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2020 6.2 6.2 3 0 0
2019 5.5 5.5 4 0 0
2018 17.1 13.5 14 0 0
2017 3.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423930 · AZ · Phoenix

1,126 Recyclable materials (e.g., glass, metal, paper) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mercer Company 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schupan Recycling Wixom 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR PnP Merced 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR BRANCH 04 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE 7892_18700 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE EPCOR Sun City Water, EPCOR Sun City West Water, EPCOR Sun City West Wastewater 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5921040 - Intel Campus 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE A1 DESERT ELECTRIC CO. 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR Bear Mountain Dairy 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Kenyon Plastering of Stockton, Inc. 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR HDM Hydraulics LLC 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Dahle Orchards LLC 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Assured Aggregates Company, Inc. 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kasco Structures LLC 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE CFS 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pope Scientific, Inc. 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.