Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Oregon

Regency Village at Redmond

Redmond, OR · ~27 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Regency Village at Redmond runs at 356% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Regency Village at Redmond: 13.5 TCR = 356% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Regency Village at Redmond safety composite

Regency Village at Redmond scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.7

2016→2024

Regency Village at Redmond injury rate improved

Regency Village at Redmond's TCR fell 4.7 from 17.4 in 2016 to 12.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 78.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.94× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=17.4 · 2018=11.0 · 2019=13.2 · 2020=28.2 · 2021=12.1 · 2022=78.9 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=12.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Redmond, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.5 · 356% of ind

  • DART 12.7 DART
  • RANK #155/218
  • PHOTO Lighthouse at Lincoln
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lighthouse at Lincoln (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Regency Village at Redmond in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Regency Village at Redmond averages 13.5 TCR (356% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Regency Village at Redmond TCR series: 2016=17.4 · 2018=11 · 2019=13.2 · 2020=28.2 · 2021=12.1 · 2022=78.9 · 2023=0 · 2024=12.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Regency Village at Redmond falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #155 safest of 218 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Oregon.

Regency Village at Redmond (27 employees, TCR 13.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Regency Village at Redmond
Regency Village at Redmond (27 employees, TCR 13.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Regency Village at Redmond has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.7 12.7 3 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 78.9 78.9 1 15 0
2021 12.1 12.1 2 1 0
2020 28.2 8.1 4 3 0
2019 13.2 0.0 3 0 0
2018 11.0 11.0 3 0 0
2016 17.4 17.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · OR · Redmond

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 90 employers in Redmond, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lighthouse at Lincoln 13.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Evergreen Village at Fort Wayne 13.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR senior management OF mASS 13.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Symphony at Centerville 13.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gold Dust Potato Processors, Inc. 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE NW Transplants LLC 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Home Farm 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE COLEMAN AGRICULTURE INC 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Redmond School District 975 FTE
CITY-NEAR High Desert Education Services 737 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Charles Health System Redmond 495 FTE
CITY-NEAR BasX Solutions 483 FTE
NAT-TCR 850 Golden Valley, MN 13.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Woodgate Road Building 13.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Tri-State Fire Protection District 13.5 TCR
NAT-TCR The Henson Company, Inc. 13.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Momma Chan LLC 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maddrell Excavating, LLC 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE El Milagro Inc. St. Charles 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE South Side Moving 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.