Sewer systems · Minnesota

Regional Maintenance Facility- Interceptor Services

Eagan, MN · ~77 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Regional Maintenance Facility- Interceptor Services runs at 446% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sewer systems workplace, earning a grade F.

Regional Maintenance Facility- Interceptor Services: 5.3 TCR = 446% of Sewer systems BLS 1.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Regional Maintenance Facility- Interceptor Services safety composite

Regional Maintenance Facility- Interceptor Services scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2018→2023

Regional Maintenance Facility- Interceptor Services injury rate improved

Regional Maintenance Facility- Interceptor Services's TCR fell 2.8 from 7.3 in 2018 to 4.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=7.3 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=4.8 · 2022=6.6 · 2023=4.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221320 · Eagan, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.3 · 446% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #10/13
  • PHOTO West Bay Sanitary Di…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~77 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: West Bay Sanitary District (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Regional Maintenance Facility- Interceptor Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Regional Maintenance Facility- Interceptor Services averages 5.3 TCR (446% of the Sewer systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Regional Maintenance Facility- Interceptor Services TCR series: 2018=7.3 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=4.8 · 2022=6.6 · 2023=4.5 · BLS 1.2

Where Regional Maintenance Facility- Interceptor Services falls in its industry

400 Sewer systems establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 13 Sewer systems employers in Minnesota.

Regional Maintenance Facility- Interceptor Services (77 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Regional Maintenance Facility- Interceptor Services
Regional Maintenance Facility- Interceptor Services (77 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Regional Maintenance Facility- Interceptor Services has more employees than the Sewer systems median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.5 3.0 3 0 0
2022 6.6 4.0 5 0 0
2020 4.8 1.6 3 0 0
2019 3.5 0.0 1 1 0
2018 7.3 3.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221320 · MN · Eagan

400 Sewer systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 285 employers in Eagan, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR West Bay Sanitary District 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR VCU Water Reclamation (EKPCF) 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valencia Water Reclamation Plant 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rogers 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE St Cloud Service Center-LB 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shaw-Lundquist Associates, Inc. Eagan office 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Linco Fab, Inc 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE John A. Dalsin & Son, Inc. 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime Therapeutics - Prime Landing & Remote 6,596 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thomson Reuters - Eagan 4,474 FTE
CITY-NEAR MSPXL0001 MSPXL0001 4,156 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lifeworks Services, Inc 3,663 FTE
NAT-TCR Zurn Bensenville 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Preferred Popcorn 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Norlen Incorporated - Schofield Location 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Nysyr - Syracuse 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cal-Maine Foods Inc. 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE RAL-HRP-RALEIGH 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Milliken Hatch 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Grove at Canopy 77 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.