Pleasure boats manufacturing · North Carolina

Regulator Marine, Inc.

Edenton, NC · ~212 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Regulator Marine, Inc. runs at 70% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Pleasure boats manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Regulator Marine, Inc.: 2.3 TCR = 70% of Pleasure boats manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Regulator Marine, Inc. safety composite

Regulator Marine, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2024

Regulator Marine, Inc. injury rate improved

Regulator Marine, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.2 from 2.2 in 2016 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.2 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=5.0 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336612 · Edenton, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 70% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #3/9
  • PHOTO Zodiac of North Amer…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~212 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Zodiac of North America, Inc. Main (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Regulator Marine, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Regulator Marine, Inc. averages 2.3 TCR (70% of the Pleasure boats manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Regulator Marine, Inc. TCR series: 2016=2.2 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=5 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=1 · BLS 3.3

Where Regulator Marine, Inc. falls in its industry

249 Pleasure boats manufacturing establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 9 Pleasure boats manufacturing employers in North Carolina.

Regulator Marine, Inc. (212 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 121 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Regulator Marine, Inc.
Regulator Marine, Inc. (212 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 121 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Regulator Marine, Inc. has more employees than the Pleasure boats manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 0.5 2 0 0
2023 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2022 3.3 3.3 10 0 0
2021 2.3 1.9 6 0 0
2020 5.0 1.5 5 5 0
2019 2.5 0.8 6 0 0
2018 1.8 0.9 4 0 0
2017 2.3 0.6 4 0 0
2016 2.2 2.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336612 · NC · Edenton

249 Pleasure boats manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 27 employers in Edenton, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Zodiac of North America, Inc. Main 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR RFD Beaufort, INC 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Scully Metal Fabrication, Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ocean Aero, Inc. 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Leoterra Development, Inc. 212 FTE
STATE-SIZE Precision Walls Inc-Charlotte 212 FTE
STATE-SIZE Siteworks LLC Office 212 FTE
STATE-SIZE CK Contractors & Development North Carolina 212 FTE
CITY-NEAR ECU Health Chowan Hospital 328 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vidant Chowan Hospital 326 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jimbos Jumbos 283 FTE
CITY-NEAR Atlantic Tire - Store 14 116 FTE
NAT-TCR GVEC Cuero SOC 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hyatt Place Secaucus Meadowlands 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Meridian Boulder 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Grand Prairie Container 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Seattle Fish Company LLC 212 FTE
NAT-SIZE Casam - Santa Maria Center 212 FTE
NAT-SIZE EMS Aurora on France 212 FTE
NAT-SIZE Leesburg 212 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.