Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) · Oregon

relay resources

Portland, OR · ~733 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

relay resources runs at 78% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) workplace, earning a grade B.

relay resources: 3.0 TCR = 78% of Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

relay resources safety composite

relay resources scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

relay resources: 0.1 → 8.2 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 8.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.48× in 2020

relay resources's TCR rose 8.1 from 0.1 in 2016 to 8.2 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624310 · Portland, OR AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.0 · 78% of ind

  • DART 4.4 DART
  • RANK #5/67
  • PHOTO Northwoods Inc of Wi…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 103 inj
  • SIZE ~733 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Northwoods Inc of Wisconsin (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

relay resources in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows relay resources averages 3.0 TCR (78% of the Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

relay resources TCR series: 2016=0.1 · 2018=0.6 · 2020=8.2 · BLS 3.8

Where relay resources falls in its industry

1,455 Vocational rehabilitation or h establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 67 Vocational rehabilitation or h employers in Oregon.

relay resources (733 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate relay resources
relay resources (733 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

relay resources has more employees than the Vocational rehabilitation or habilitatio median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 8.2 4.4 38 7 0
2018 0.6 0.4 35 3 0
2016 0.1 0.0 30 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624310 · OR · Portland

1,455 Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 1,728 employers in Portland, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Northwoods Inc of Wisconsin 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Phoenixville Store 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR FBI Custodial 1975 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Escanaba Store 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Qorvo US, Inc. 734 FTE
STATE-SIZE High Desert Education Services 737 FTE
STATE-SIZE Qorvo US, Inc. 739 FTE
STATE-SIZE 12591 725 FTE
CITY-NEAR OHSU Main Campus 18,003 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR349 PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR-PORTLA 4,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR346 PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CTR-PORTLAND 3,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000530 3,498 FTE
NAT-TCR 04 - Green Road 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cambrex High Point, Inc 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Interbake Foods 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR WHI Chicago Northwest Management LLC 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Central Carolina Hospital 733 FTE
NAT-SIZE Houston Methodist Institute for Academic Medicine 733 FTE
NAT-SIZE Watertown Regional Medical Center 733 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stone Mountain Park INC 733 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.