Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors · Virginia

Remco, Inc. - Richmond

Ashland, VA · ~41 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Remco, Inc. - Richmond runs at 90% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

Remco, Inc. - Richmond: 2.5 TCR = 90% of Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Remco, Inc. - Richmond safety composite

Remco, Inc. - Richmond scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Remco, Inc. - Richmond: 0.0 → 1.4 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 5.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.58× in 2024

Remco, Inc. - Richmond's TCR rose 1.4 from 0.0 in 2020 to 1.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Ashland, VA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.5 · 90% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #73/152
  • PHOTO Team Mechanical of T…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Team Mechanical of Texas, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Remco, Inc. - Richmond in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Remco, Inc. - Richmond averages 2.5 TCR (90% of the Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Remco, Inc. - Richmond TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 2.8

Where Remco, Inc. - Richmond falls in its industry

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-c establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #73 safest of 152 Heating, ventilation and air-c employers in Virginia.

Remco, Inc. - Richmond (41 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Remco, Inc. - Richmond
Remco, Inc. - Richmond (41 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Remco, Inc. - Richmond has fewer employees than the Heating, ventilation and air-conditionin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2023 3.5 3.5 2 0 0
2022 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2021 5.5 5.5 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · VA · Ashland

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 134 employers in Ashland, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Team Mechanical of Texas, LLC 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR S.I. Goldman Company, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sav-Mor Mechanical Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR National Fire Protection 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fort Bragg 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Public Works- Facilities 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hampton Roads Contracting, Inc. 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE International Paper - Franklin 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon Transportation Services : RIC5 1,187 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - RIC5 1,077 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1730 RNDC-ASHLAND 486 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4609-1730 468 FTE
NAT-TCR Wright Material Solutions 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Cannon IV 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Prysmian Group General Cable Lebanon RDC 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Fareway Stores, Inc. 502 Cherokee 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE North Coast Energy Services, Inc. 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heartland Express Columbus 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE E H Construction LLC 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Missoula Electric Coop 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.