Engineering consulting services · New Jersey

Remington & Vernick Engineers II, INC.

Cherry Hill, NJ · ~444 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Remington & Vernick Engineers II, INC. runs at 204% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Engineering consulting services workplace, earning a grade F.

Remington & Vernick Engineers II, INC.: 1.0 TCR = 204% of Engineering consulting services BLS 0.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Remington & Vernick Engineers II, INC. safety composite

Remington & Vernick Engineers II, INC. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2022→2024

Remington & Vernick Engineers II, INC. injury rate improved

Remington & Vernick Engineers II, INC.'s TCR fell 0.8 from 1.4 in 2022 to 0.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=1.4 · 2023=1.0 · 2024=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541330 · Cherry Hill, NJ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 1.0 · 204% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #8/9
  • PHOTO B04
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~444 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: B04 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Remington & Vernick Engineers II, INC. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Remington & Vernick Engineers II, INC. averages 1.0 TCR (204% of the Engineering consulting services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Remington & Vernick Engineers II, INC. TCR series: 2022=1.4 · 2023=1 · 2024=0.6 · BLS 0.5

Where Remington & Vernick Engineers II, INC. falls in its industry

690 Engineering consulting service establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 9 Engineering consulting service employers in New Jersey.

Remington & Vernick Engineers II, INC. (444 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Remington & Vernick Engineers II, INC.
Remington & Vernick Engineers II, INC. (444 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 0.9

Remington & Vernick Engineers II, INC. has more employees than the Engineering consulting services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.6 0.4 3 0 0
2023 1.0 0.3 4 0 0
2022 1.4 0.6 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541330 · NJ · Cherry Hill

690 Engineering consulting services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 145 employers in Cherry Hill, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR B04 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Solana Beach 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR HQ-Fredericksburg 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR PRIME Construction Management & Survey, Inc 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Westwood Regional Board of Education 444 FTE
STATE-SIZE 200 Bowman - Voorhees Health & Wellness Center 444 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation - Saddle Brook 444 FTE
STATE-SIZE Party Rental LTD TB 443 FTE
CITY-NEAR Protocall NJ, Inc. NJ HC 2,465 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riggs Distler & Company Inc 1,392 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jefferson Hospital Cherry Hill 1,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jefferson Health NJ Cherry Hill - Formerly Kennedy Health 1,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Supreme Roofing, LP 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Nelson Tree Service, LLC 474 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Mass Bay Electrical Corp. 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lindenmeyr Houston 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lactalis US Yogurt, Inc. 444 FTE
NAT-SIZE Max Home, LLC 444 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alle Processing Corp 444 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gateway Healthcare, Inc 444 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.