Skilled nursing facilities · Texas

Renaissance Park Multi-Care Center

Fort Worth, TX · ~70 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Renaissance Park Multi-Care Center runs at 230% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Renaissance Park Multi-Care Center: 15.0 TCR = 230% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Renaissance Park Multi-Care Center safety composite

Renaissance Park Multi-Care Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−34.0

2020→2023

Renaissance Park Multi-Care Center injury rate improved

Renaissance Park Multi-Care Center's TCR fell 34.0 from 37.7 in 2020 to 3.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 37.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=37.7 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=3.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Fort Worth, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.0 · 230% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #1018/1034
  • PHOTO Candlewood Valley He…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~70 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Candlewood Valley Health (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Renaissance Park Multi-Care Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Renaissance Park Multi-Care Center averages 15.0 TCR (230% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Renaissance Park Multi-Care Center TCR series: 2020=37.7 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=3.7 · BLS 6.5

Where Renaissance Park Multi-Care Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1018 safest of 1034 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Texas.

Renaissance Park Multi-Care Center (70 employees, TCR 15.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Renaissance Park Multi-Care Center
Renaissance Park Multi-Care Center (70 employees, TCR 15.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Renaissance Park Multi-Care Center has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.7 1.9 2 0 0
2022 3.5 3.5 2 0 0
2020 37.7 35.9 1 20 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · TX · Fort Worth

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,346 employers in Fort Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Candlewood Valley Health 15.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clarendale St. Peters Operations, LLC 15.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 226_350 15.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR PowerBack Rehabilitation Exton 15.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sales-OOS 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Legacy Farms 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE GP 176/GP 178 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Angelo 1214 Gas Plant Rd, San Angelo, TX 76904 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 16,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Fort Worth Campus (1093) 13,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center 4,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX- Fort Worth 4,667 FTE
NAT-TCR Regency Pullman 15.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Clarendale St. Peters Operations, LLC 15.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CPK-NJ 15.0 TCR
NAT-TCR HG285 15.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Valassis Belleville 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ridge Area Arc, Inc. 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harts Nursery of Jefferson, Inc 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Capstone Group, Inc 70 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.