Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · California

Renee Tims

Los Angeles, CA · ~28 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Renee Tims runs at 71% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Renee Tims: 2.7 TCR = 71% of Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Renee Tims safety composite

Renee Tims scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Renee Tims: 0.0 → 5.4 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 5.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2018

Renee Tims's TCR rose 5.4 from 0.0 in 2017 to 5.4 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Los Angeles, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.7 · 71% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #60/230
  • PHOTO Jewish Family Servic…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jewish Family Service Association of Cleveland (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Renee Tims in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Renee Tims averages 2.7 TCR (71% of the Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Renee Tims TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=5.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Renee Tims falls in its industry

1,320 Activity centers for disabled establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #60 safest of 230 Activity centers for disabled employers in California.

Renee Tims (28 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Renee Tims
Renee Tims (28 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Renee Tims has fewer employees than the Activity centers for disabled persons, t median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 5.4 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · CA · Los Angeles

1,320 Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 2,064 employers in Los Angeles, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jewish Family Service Association of Cleveland 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arizona Retirement Centers Inc dba Sierra Winds 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR SAHCDC 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Intervals 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Davis Ranch L.L.C. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Steinbeck Country Produce 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harlan Family Ranch 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE KKG Equipment Company, LLC32 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. 50,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Los Angeles 40,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR LADWP 11,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 10,346 FTE
NAT-TCR Salt-Akron 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Manor Care Health Services - Cedar Rapids 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Northwest Community Healthcare Medical Group at 1538 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Ukpeagvik Inupiat Corporation 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dallas Hospice 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oahu Construction Operations 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rockwell Automation- Memphis TN (MTN) 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mercy Family Clinic - Clear Lake 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.