Mirrors, framed (except automotive) or unframed, made from purchased glass · Mississippi

Renin US LLC

Tupelo, MS · ~103 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Renin US LLC runs at 134% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Mirrors, framed (except automotive) or unframed, made from purchased glass workplace, earning a grade D.

Renin US LLC: 4.4 TCR = 134% of Mirrors, framed (except automotive) or unframed, made from purchased glass BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Renin US LLC safety composite

Renin US LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2016→2024

Renin US LLC injury rate improved

Renin US LLC's TCR fell 2.9 from 4.7 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.7 · 2017=6.7 · 2018=5.9 · 2019=6.2 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327215 · Tupelo, MS ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.4 · 134% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO Cardinal FG - Tomah TG
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 40 inj
  • SIZE ~103 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cardinal FG - Tomah TG (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Renin US LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Renin US LLC averages 4.4 TCR (134% of the Mirrors, framed (except automotive) or unframed, made from purchased glass BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Renin US LLC TCR series: 2016=4.7 · 2017=6.7 · 2018=5.9 · 2019=6.2 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=1.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Renin US LLC falls in its industry

441 Mirrors, framed (except automo establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Mirrors, framed (except automo employers in Mississippi.

Renin US LLC (103 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Renin US LLC
Renin US LLC (103 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Renin US LLC has more employees than the Mirrors, framed (except automotive) or u median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.8 1.8 2 0 0
2023 1.6 0.8 2 0 0
2022 3.8 2.3 5 0 0
2021 5.5 4.7 7 0 0
2020 3.9 0.0 5 0 0
2019 6.2 4.1 6 0 0
2018 5.9 5.9 5 0 0
2017 6.7 2.7 5 0 0
2016 4.7 3.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327215 · MS · Tupelo

441 Mirrors, framed (except automotive) or unframed, made from purchased glass employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 144 employers in Tupelo, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cardinal FG - Tomah TG 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Intigral-Austintown 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oldcastle BuildingEnvelope - Westbrook(Spiller) 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cardinal LG - Amery LG 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Central Electric Power Association 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE BrandSafway Solutions LLC - Chevron Refinery - Pascagoula 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plum Creek Environmental 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Owens & Minor Southaven 103 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Mississippi Medical Center 5,727 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tupelo Cooper Tire & Rubber Plant (SIC 3011) 1,416 FTE
CITY-NEAR JESCO, Inc. 394 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tupelo Operations 393 FTE
NAT-TCR Arrow-Crete Construction, LLC 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Murray Equipment, Inc 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ozark Fire Sprinkler Co Inc 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Transit 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pedricktown 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Louisville South 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kincaid Upholstery Furniture Plant 21 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ambler Extended Care 103 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.