Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) · Massachusetts

Residence Inn Natick

Natick, MA · ~36 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Residence Inn Natick runs at 165% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) workplace, earning a grade D.

Residence Inn Natick: 5.0 TCR = 165% of Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS 3.0 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Residence Inn Natick safety composite

Residence Inn Natick scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Residence Inn Natick held a steady TCR band

Residence Inn Natick's TCR held near 0.1 from 6.3 in 2021 to 6.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=6.3 · 2022=7.3 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=6.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Natick, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.0 · 165% of ind

  • DART 6.2 DART
  • RANK #111/204
  • PHOTO Airport Gardens Hotel
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Airport Gardens Hotel (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Residence Inn Natick in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Residence Inn Natick averages 5.0 TCR (165% of the Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Residence Inn Natick TCR series: 2021=6.3 · 2022=7.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=6.2 · BLS 3.0

Where Residence Inn Natick falls in its industry

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #111 safest of 204 Hotel management services (i.e employers in Massachusetts.

Residence Inn Natick (36 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Residence Inn Natick
Residence Inn Natick (36 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Residence Inn Natick has fewer employees than the Hotel management services (i.e., providi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.2 6.2 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 7.3 3.7 2 0 0
2021 6.3 6.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · MA · Natick

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 50 employers in Natick, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Airport Gardens Hotel 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hampton Inn West Covina 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trump International Hotel and Tower Condominium 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR U15, U16, & U17 FORWARD ENERGY 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jonathan's Sprouts Inc. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Metro Elevator NE, Inc. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cafco Construction Management, LLC 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE White Schiavone JV 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4701-912WBE 490 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wegmans Natick 132 396 FTE
CITY-NEAR Natick Collection 040 275 FTE
CITY-NEAR ROCHE BROS - NATICK 242 FTE
NAT-TCR So Cal Post Acute Care 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Oxford IL 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Fairbanks Transportation 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Allentown 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Embassy Suites by Hilton Dallas Market Center 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE P&R Contracting 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meals on Wheels of the Greater Lehi 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Havasu Regional Medical Center - EVS 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.