Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Indiana

Residences at Coffee Creek

Chesterton, IN · ~81 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Residences at Coffee Creek runs at 481% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Residences at Coffee Creek: 18.3 TCR = 481% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Residences at Coffee Creek safety composite

Residences at Coffee Creek scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 16.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Residences at Coffee Creek: 9.9 → 16.9 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 24.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.93× in 2024

Residences at Coffee Creek's TCR rose 7.0 from 9.9 in 2019 to 16.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 24.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.93× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Chesterton, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.3 · 481% of ind

  • DART 16.9 DART
  • RANK #131/133
  • PHOTO Summerhouse Park Pro…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 55 inj
  • SIZE ~81 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Summerhouse Park Provence (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Residences at Coffee Creek in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Residences at Coffee Creek averages 18.3 TCR (481% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Residences at Coffee Creek TCR series: 2019=9.9 · 2020=18.2 · 2021=24 · 2022=19.4 · 2023=21.2 · 2024=16.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Residences at Coffee Creek falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #131 safest of 133 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Indiana.

Residences at Coffee Creek (81 employees, TCR 18.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Residences at Coffee Creek
Residences at Coffee Creek (81 employees, TCR 18.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Residences at Coffee Creek has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 16.9 16.9 10 0 0
2023 21.2 19.3 10 1 0
2022 19.4 14.6 12 0 0
2021 24.0 19.2 10 0 0
2020 18.2 18.2 9 0 0
2019 9.9 9.9 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · IN · Chesterton

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 27 employers in Chesterton, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Summerhouse Park Provence 18.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Autumn Trace of Rensselaer 18.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avamere Healthcare Services, LLC 18.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eagle Landing - Corner House 18.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jenacre Egg Farm 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Newton County Egg Farm 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Indiana American Water-Northwest District Service Center 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alva Electric Inc 81 FTE
CITY-NEAR Urschel 447 FTE
CITY-NEAR Urschel Laboratories 442 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5472-000003189 170 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5472-000001189 167 FTE
NAT-TCR Rsw-Ground Ops 18.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Pearl's II Eden for Elders 18.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Summerhouse Park Provence 18.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0554 Hewlett 18.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE FIM 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon Delivery Station 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Qlarant Inc Baltimore 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE 815 Industrial pkw. 81 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.