Sprinkler system, building, installation · California

Residential Fire Systems Inc.

Anaheim, CA · ~115 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Residential Fire Systems Inc. runs at 166% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Sprinkler system, building, installation workplace, earning a grade D.

Residential Fire Systems Inc.: 4.7 TCR = 166% of Sprinkler system, building, installation BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Residential Fire Systems Inc. safety composite

Residential Fire Systems Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.1

2017→2024

Residential Fire Systems Inc. injury rate improved

Residential Fire Systems Inc.'s TCR fell 10.1 from 12.8 in 2017 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 12.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=12.8 · 2018=8.7 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=4.6 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Anaheim, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 166% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #348/594
  • PHOTO Inspector Drain, Inc
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~115 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Inspector Drain, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Residential Fire Systems Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Residential Fire Systems Inc. averages 4.7 TCR (166% of the Sprinkler system, building, installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Residential Fire Systems Inc. TCR series: 2017=12.8 · 2018=8.7 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=4.6 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 2.8

Where Residential Fire Systems Inc. falls in its industry

5,793 Sprinkler system, building, in establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #348 safest of 594 Sprinkler system, building, in employers in California.

Residential Fire Systems Inc. (115 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Residential Fire Systems Inc.
Residential Fire Systems Inc. (115 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Residential Fire Systems Inc. has more employees than the Sprinkler system, building, installation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 2.8 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.8 0.9 2 0 0
2020 4.6 0.0 4 0 0
2019 6.5 0.9 6 1 0
2018 8.7 2.9 12 0 0
2017 12.8 2.1 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · CA · Anaheim

5,793 Sprinkler system, building, installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 630 employers in Anaheim, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Inspector Drain, Inc 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mechanical Solutions Construction Inc 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shakley Mechanical Inc 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR W.H. Demmons 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Buona Terra Farming 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE ROSE & A FLC 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE CA-CSBU - Covina 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE Visalia Base - Bld: 0080 - 15 115 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S. Inc., dba Disneyland Resort 38,057 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. d/b/a Disneyland Resort 28,066 FTE
CITY-NEAR Doubletree By Hilton Suites Anaheim 1,933 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08881053 ORANGE CO ANAHEIM MEDICAL CENTER 1,658 FTE
NAT-TCR Vitex Extrusion 109 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR YMCA of Memphis - Church Health 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR AEPS 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR GA010 Albany Container 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE A-MAZE-ING Delivery LLC 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - HAT2 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon Retail LLC - MAK3 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nucor Towers & Structures Inc 115 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.