Self-help organizations for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · New York
Resource Center for Independent Living
Utica, NY · ~3,351 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- A
- Excellent Safety Record
- 1.2
- Avg TCR
- 3.8
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Resource Center for Independent Living runs at 31% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Self-help organizations for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade A.
Resource Center for Independent Living: 1.2 TCR = 31% of Self-help organizations for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)
Resource Center for Independent Living safety composite
Resource Center for Independent Living scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).
69/100
Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures
- Total Case Rate (TCR)
- B 1.17 per 100 workers
Safer than 89% of industry peers
- DART rate
- C 0.43 per 100 workers
Safer than 60% of industry peers
- Fatalities
- D 0
Safer than 51% of industry peers
Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).
TCR Δ
−0.6
2016→2024
Resource Center for Independent Living injury rate improved
Resource Center for Independent Living's TCR fell 0.6 from 1.5 in 2016 to 0.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).
2016=1.5 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=0.9
OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard
Establishment book 624120 · Utica, NY AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE
Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 31% of ind
- DART 0.4 DART
- RANK #17/158
- PHOTO DDRC Main Building
- BOOK 9y book
- INJ 164 inj
- SIZE ~3,351 FTE
Nearest TCR peer: DDRC Main Building (0.0 TCR gap)
Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →
Resource Center for Independent Living in the TCR neighbourhood
Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers
- This site
Resource Center for Independent Living
1.2 TCR
- DDRC Main Buil
DDRC Main Building
1.2 TCR
- CCSI-Hillside
CCSI-Hillside
1.2 TCR
- INSTITUTE ON A
INSTITUTE ON AGING SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, LLC
1.2 TCR
- Wheaton
Wheaton
1.2 TCR
What this shows Resource Center for Independent Living averages 1.2 TCR (31% of the Self-help organizations for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).
Resource Center for Independent Living TCR series: 2016=1.5 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 3.8
Where Resource Center for Independent Living falls in its industry
1,320 Self-help organizations for di establishmentsSafer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.
Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 158 Self-help organizations for di employers in New York.
Resource Center for Independent Living has more employees than the Self-help organizations for disabled per median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 18 | 1 | 0 |
| 2022 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 16 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 27 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 24 | 1 | 0 |
| 2016 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
OSHA ITA peer cross-reference
Establishment peer ledger
624120 · NY · Utica
1,320 Self-help organizations for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 148 employers in Utica, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.
| Rel | Establishment | Metric |
|---|---|---|
| NAICS-TCR | DDRC Main Building | 1.2 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | CCSI-Hillside | 1.2 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | INSTITUTE ON AGING SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, LLC | 1.2 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Wheaton | 1.2 TCR |
| STATE-SIZE | Good Samaritan Hospital | 3,341 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Mount Sinai West | 3,323 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | GSC : Schenectady, NY, USA | 3,397 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | St. Peter's Hospital | 3,428 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Faxton St. Lukes | 1,727 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | St Elizabeth Medical Center | 1,324 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Utica University | 915 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | 125 Business park Dr. | 869 FTE |
| NAT-TCR | The Countertop Shop Ltd | 1.2 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Callery Plant | 1.2 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Global Mining Denison | 1.2 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Osi Ldi | 1.2 TCR |
| NAT-SIZE | Clyde Manufacturing | 3,351 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | UPMC Physician Operations and Professional Service | 3,354 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Finney County Plant | 3,354 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Northside Hospital Forsyth | 3,354 FTE |
Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.