General public administration · California

Resource Management Agency

Ventura, CA · ~219 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Resource Management Agency runs at 106% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General public administration workplace, earning a grade C.

Resource Management Agency: 3.4 TCR = 106% of General public administration BLS 3.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Resource Management Agency safety composite

Resource Management Agency scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.7

2017→2024

Resource Management Agency injury rate improved

Resource Management Agency's TCR fell 6.7 from 8.0 in 2017 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 8.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.0 · 2018=4.0 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921190 · Ventura, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 106% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #95/256
  • PHOTO Health and Human Ser…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 49 inj
  • SIZE ~219 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Health and Human Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Resource Management Agency in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Resource Management Agency averages 3.4 TCR (106% of the General public administration BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Resource Management Agency TCR series: 2017=8 · 2018=4 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 3.2

Where Resource Management Agency falls in its industry

1,496 General public administration establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #95 safest of 256 General public administration employers in California.

Resource Management Agency (219 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Resource Management Agency
Resource Management Agency (219 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Resource Management Agency has more employees than the General public administration median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 1.3 3 0 0
2023 0.9 0.9 2 0 0
2022 0.8 0.8 2 0 0
2021 4.1 4.1 7 2 0
2020 4.5 3.2 5 5 0
2019 3.5 1.7 7 1 0
2018 4.0 2.2 9 0 0
2017 8.0 5.3 14 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921190 · CA · Ventura

1,496 General public administration employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 244 employers in Ventura, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Health and Human Services 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Yavapai County 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Red Wing 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Perquimans County 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gilroy Location 219 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mellano & Company dba Mellano Enterprises SLR 219 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Garlic Company 219 FTE
STATE-SIZE Statewide Labor Corporation 219 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 447 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 530 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6292-00000001 2,250 FTE
CITY-NEAR HSA Human Service Agency 1,516 FTE
NAT-TCR Columbia 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Drury Southwest Inc 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR J.D. Graphic Co., Inc. 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR York Imperial Plastics 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Clark Civil LLC 219 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mc Sst 219 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dynamic Transit Company 219 FTE
NAT-SIZE ShopRite of Columbia Park 219 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.