Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building · Minnesota

Retail Construction Services, Inc.

Lake Elmo, MN · ~70 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Retail Construction Services, Inc. runs at 88% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade C.

Retail Construction Services, Inc.: 2.6 TCR = 88% of Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Retail Construction Services, Inc. safety composite

Retail Construction Services, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Retail Construction Services, Inc.: 1.5 → 4.3 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 4.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.25× in 2022

Retail Construction Services, Inc.'s TCR rose 2.8 from 1.5 in 2017 to 4.3 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Lake Elmo, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.6 · 88% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #47/130
  • PHOTO Jay Car Construction…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~70 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jay Car Construction Company, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Retail Construction Services, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Retail Construction Services, Inc. averages 2.6 TCR (88% of the Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Retail Construction Services, Inc. TCR series: 2017=1.5 · 2020=1.9 · 2022=4.3 · BLS 2.9

Where Retail Construction Services, Inc. falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #47 safest of 130 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Minnesota.

Retail Construction Services, Inc. (70 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Retail Construction Services, Inc.
Retail Construction Services, Inc. (70 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Retail Construction Services, Inc. has more employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation for- median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.3 3.2 4 0 0
2020 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2017 1.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · MN · Lake Elmo

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 22 employers in Lake Elmo, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jay Car Construction Company, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1477_3014 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Water Savers 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Unlimited Construction Services, Inc. 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Harmony 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE St. Cloud Service Center 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE H2I Group 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northern Valley Machine 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR Day Camp Kumalya 2,089 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lake Elmo Inn 136 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISD# 834-Lake Elmo Elementary 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISD# 834-Oak-Land Middle School 75 FTE
NAT-TCR Bear Canyon Estates 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR USM Store #677 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR JASPER 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Grayson-Collin Electric Cooper 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE FS-Genesys Reg MC 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jerry L. Johnson & Associates 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Castleton Univ-Huden Dining 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Hca-Reston Hospital Center 70 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.