Skilled nursing facilities · Texas

Retama Manor Nursing Center/Harlingen

Harlingen, TX · ~129 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Retama Manor Nursing Center/Harlingen runs at 60% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Retama Manor Nursing Center/Harlingen: 3.9 TCR = 60% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Retama Manor Nursing Center/Harlingen safety composite

Retama Manor Nursing Center/Harlingen scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Retama Manor Nursing Center/Harlingen: 1.7 → 4.0 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 6.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.78× in 2021

Retama Manor Nursing Center/Harlingen's TCR rose 2.3 from 1.7 in 2016 to 4.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.78× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Harlingen, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.9 · 60% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #459/1034
  • PHOTO Regency at Fremont
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~129 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Regency at Fremont (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Retama Manor Nursing Center/Harlingen in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Retama Manor Nursing Center/Harlingen averages 3.9 TCR (60% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Retama Manor Nursing Center/Harlingen TCR series: 2016=1.7 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=5 · 2020=6.9 · 2021=4 · BLS 6.5

Where Retama Manor Nursing Center/Harlingen falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #459 safest of 1034 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Texas.

Retama Manor Nursing Center/Harlingen (129 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Retama Manor Nursing Center/Harlingen
Retama Manor Nursing Center/Harlingen (129 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Retama Manor Nursing Center/Harlingen has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.0 3.0 3 1 0
2020 6.9 4.9 6 1 0
2019 5.0 4.1 6 0 0
2018 3.2 1.6 4 0 0
2017 2.5 1.7 3 0 0
2016 1.7 0.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · TX · Harlingen

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 133 employers in Harlingen, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Regency at Fremont 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sumner Place 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crescent Cities SNF LLC 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 812 GREENTREE NURSING REHAB 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Petro Mechanical and Supply, LLC 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Houston Center of Excellence - Bld: TXHS - 53 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brownstone Construction 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Taylor Morrison Dallas Division 129 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4701-838 1,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Harlingen Medical Center 661 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX_Harlingen_2921 S. Expswy 83_TCIP2T20 553 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 595 354 FTE
NAT-TCR Bridgewater Marshalls DC 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Aguiar Landscaping Inc. 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Transteck Inc. - Easton (Aurora) 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Pro-Visions - Le Mars 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hebron CLS 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3550 Market Street 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aludyne West Michigan LLC - Stevensville 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jennings McCall Center 129 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.