Nonferrous metals (except aluminum, copper) secondary smelting and refining · New York

Revere Smelting & Refining

Middletown, NY · ~283 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Revere Smelting & Refining runs at 128% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Nonferrous metals (except aluminum, copper) secondary smelting and refining workplace, earning a grade D.

Revere Smelting & Refining: 4.2 TCR = 128% of Nonferrous metals (except aluminum, copper) secondary smelting and refining BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Revere Smelting & Refining safety composite

Revere Smelting & Refining scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2016→2021

Revere Smelting & Refining injury rate improved

Revere Smelting & Refining's TCR fell 0.8 from 5.5 in 2016 to 4.7 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.5 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=4.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331492 · Middletown, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.2 · 128% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #7/11
  • PHOTO Houston Metal
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 75 inj
  • SIZE ~283 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Houston Metal (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Revere Smelting & Refining in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Revere Smelting & Refining averages 4.2 TCR (128% of the Nonferrous metals (except aluminum, copper) secondary smelting and refining BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Revere Smelting & Refining TCR series: 2016=5.5 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=4.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Revere Smelting & Refining falls in its industry

132 Nonferrous metals (except alum establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 11 Nonferrous metals (except alum employers in New York.

Revere Smelting & Refining (283 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Revere Smelting & Refining
Revere Smelting & Refining (283 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Revere Smelting & Refining has more employees than the Nonferrous metals (except aluminum, copp median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.7 1.7 14 0 0
2020 4.3 1.8 12 0 0
2019 3.8 1.4 11 0 0
2018 3.8 2.4 10 1 0
2017 3.5 1.4 10 0 0
2016 5.5 1.2 18 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331492 · NY · Middletown

132 Nonferrous metals (except aluminum, copper) secondary smelting and refining employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 124 employers in Middletown, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Houston Metal 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 300 Park East Drive 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rockwood Facility 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR H. Kramer & Co. 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Henkels & McCoy, New York - Montrose 283 FTE
STATE-SIZE L&L PAINTING CO., INC. 283 FTE
STATE-SIZE PaperWorks Industry 283 FTE
STATE-SIZE 63780016 SUFFERN 283 FTE
CITY-NEAR NY-05 4,926 FTE
CITY-NEAR ORANGE REGIONAL MEDICAL 2,772 FTE
CITY-NEAR NY_Middletown_2 Industrial Dr_TW272320 497 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1959 427 FTE
NAT-TCR Arkansas 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 103971 - Leonard WTP Ozone Facility 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Automotive Steering Columns, LLC 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Store #018 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE RENUoil of America Inc. 283 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hendersonville Main Office 283 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glynn Electric 283 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dcor LLC 283 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.