Window frames and sash, wood and covered wood, manufacturing · New Jersey
Revival Sash
Springfield, NJ · ~44 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- D
- Poor Safety Record
- 6.5
- Avg TCR
- 3.3
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Revival Sash runs at 198% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Window frames and sash, wood and covered wood, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.
- D
- Poor Safety Record
- 6.5
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 3.3
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 6
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Revival Sash's OSHA Total Case Rate to the BLS industry benchmark across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). This reflects reported recordable injuries, not an independent safety inspection -- underreporting is a known limitation of employer self-recordkeeping.
Injury rate over time
Revival Sash's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.3 industry benchmark.
Where Revival Sash falls in its industry
473 Window frames and sash, wood a establishmentsSafer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.
Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 6 Window frames and sash, wood a employers in New Jersey.
Revival Sash has an average TCR of 6.5, which is 198% of the industry average (3.3) for Window frames and sash, wood and covered wood, manufacturing. This is worse than average.
The letter grade is a transparent derived index PlainSafetyScore computes from public OSHA ITA and BLS benchmark data, not an official OSHA rating or safety certification. Full formula and thresholds: Methodology.
Trend analysis for Revival Sash
Between 2018 and 2020, Revival Sash's Total Case Rate improved from 7.0 to 6.1 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 12% decrease across 2 years of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2020, at a TCR of 6.1, while 2018 saw the highest rate, at 7.0, a spread of 0.8 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a comparatively narrow spread, suggesting a fairly consistent safety record across the 2 years with a usable rate on file, rather than one outlier year skewing the multi-year average.
Summed across those 2 reporting years, Revival Sash recorded 6 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
All injury, illness, and fatality figures on this page are sourced from Revival Sash's own mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 321911 - Window frames and sash, wood and covered wood, manufacturing.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2020)
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
3 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 97,760 hours worked = 6.14 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Revival Sash (this establishment) | 6.55 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg |
| Door frames and sash, wood and covered wood, manufacturing industry avg | 3.30 | BLS IIF, NAICS 321911 |
| New Jersey state avg (all industries) | 4.90 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Revival Sash to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2020: 3 reportable incidents · 3 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2018: 3 reportable incidents · 3 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Revival Sash's reported OSHA injury record versus its Window frames and sash, wood and covered wood, manufacturing peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.
- At 198% of the Window frames and sash, wood and covered wood, manufacturing benchmark, Revival Sash reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Window frames and sash, wood and covered wood, manufacturing sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Revival Sash's safety grade?
How many injuries has Revival Sash reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry and by workforce size within New Jersey - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~6.5)
Explore More Safety Data
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.