Acrylic film and unlaminated sheet (except packaging) manufacturing · Colorado

Reynolds Polymer Technology

Grand Junction, CO · ~103 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Reynolds Polymer Technology runs at 54% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Acrylic film and unlaminated sheet (except packaging) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Reynolds Polymer Technology: 1.8 TCR = 54% of Acrylic film and unlaminated sheet (except packaging) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Reynolds Polymer Technology safety composite

Reynolds Polymer Technology scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2016→2024

Reynolds Polymer Technology injury rate improved

Reynolds Polymer Technology's TCR fell 2.4 from 3.4 in 2016 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.4 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=3.3 · 2020=2.0 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=1.0 · 2023=1.0 · 2024=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326113 · Grand Junction, CO AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 54% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P64
  • PHOTO Winpak Films Inc.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~103 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Winpak Films Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Reynolds Polymer Technology in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Reynolds Polymer Technology averages 1.8 TCR (54% of the Acrylic film and unlaminated sheet (except packaging) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Reynolds Polymer Technology TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.3 · 2020=2 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=1 · 2023=1 · 2024=1 · BLS 3.3

Where Reynolds Polymer Technology falls in its industry

303 Acrylic film and unlaminated s establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Reynolds Polymer Technology (103 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 98 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Reynolds Polymer Technology
Reynolds Polymer Technology (103 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 98 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Reynolds Polymer Technology has more employees than the Acrylic film and unlaminated sheet (exce median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2023 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2022 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2021 2.6 0.9 3 0 0
2020 2.0 2.0 2 0 0
2018 3.3 1.6 4 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.4 0.9 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326113 · CO · Grand Junction

303 Acrylic film and unlaminated sheet (except packaging) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 233 employers in Grand Junction, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Winpak Films Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rogers Corporation 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bixby International Corp 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spartech LLC - McMinnville 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Midwest Farms LLC 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE La Plata Electric Association 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE PSC Industrial Outsourcing, LP-SOC 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Boulder Plant 103 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital 2,336 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital and Medical Center 2,043 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Hospital 1,062 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hilltop Health Services Corporation- 609 27 1/2 Road 641 FTE
NAT-TCR Extreme Tool 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR American Excelsior Company W. Chicago 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Panhandle Rural Electric Membership Association (PREMA) 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR National Gas & Oil 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Montgomery AL Division 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Ga EMC 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Transtar Autobody Technologies 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sansbury Care Center 103 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.