Building framing (except structural steel) · California

RH Framing Incorporated

Salinas, CA · ~75 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

RH Framing Incorporated runs at 341% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Building framing (except structural steel) workplace, earning a grade F.

RH Framing Incorporated: 9.5 TCR = 341% of Building framing (except structural steel) BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

RH Framing Incorporated safety composite

RH Framing Incorporated scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.3

2017→2023

RH Framing Incorporated injury rate improved

RH Framing Incorporated's TCR fell 11.3 from 18.0 in 2017 to 6.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 18.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=18.0 · 2018=15.7 · 2019=10.4 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=11.0 · 2023=6.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238130 · Salinas, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.5 · 341% of ind

  • DART 6.7 DART
  • RANK #59/99
  • PHOTO Anderson Moran Const…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Anderson Moran Construction (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

RH Framing Incorporated in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows RH Framing Incorporated averages 9.5 TCR (341% of the Building framing (except structural steel) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

RH Framing Incorporated TCR series: 2017=18 · 2018=15.7 · 2019=10.4 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=11 · 2023=6.7 · BLS 2.8

Where RH Framing Incorporated falls in its industry

387 Building framing (except struc establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #59 safest of 99 Building framing (except struc employers in California.

RH Framing Incorporated (75 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate RH Framing Incorporated
RH Framing Incorporated (75 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.6

RH Framing Incorporated has more employees than the Building framing (except structural stee median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 6.7 6.7 3 0 0
2022 11.0 1.8 6 0 0
2021 2.7 0.5 5 0 0
2020 2.3 0.6 4 0 0
2019 10.4 8.4 5 0 0
2018 15.7 8.7 9 0 0
2017 18.0 10.8 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238130 · CA · Salinas

387 Building framing (except structural steel) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 337 employers in Salinas, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Anderson Moran Construction 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ERA REMOVAL INC 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR West Coast Framing, Inc. 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sierra West Construction, Inc. 9.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sunset Farms, Inc 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Martinelli Vineyard Managment, Inc 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE WESTVIEW BERRY FARMS 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE DJRAS CORP DBA PRIME HARVEST CONTRACTING 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foothill Packing 8,854 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foothill Packing-California 3,255 FTE
CITY-NEAR Salinas Valley Memorial Hospital 2,197 FTE
CITY-NEAR Salinas Valley Healthcare System 2,133 FTE
NAT-TCR Roanoke Warehouse 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Scott's Landscaping Inc. 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Transitions at Oakwood, LLC 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR PF NHCC SNF Ops, LLC 9.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE County Market #231 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE County Market #223 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE AUI Partners, LLC 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE International Wire - OWI 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.