Grading construction sites · South Carolina

Richardson Construction Co.

Columbia, SC · ~35 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Richardson Construction Co. runs at 89% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Grading construction sites workplace, earning a grade C.

Richardson Construction Co.: 2.5 TCR = 89% of Grading construction sites BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Richardson Construction Co. safety composite

Richardson Construction Co. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2016→2024

Richardson Construction Co. injury rate improved

Richardson Construction Co.'s TCR fell 1.3 from 3.9 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.03× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.9 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=6.2 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238910 · Columbia, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.5 · 89% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #17/26
  • PHOTO Maryland Materials M…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Maryland Materials Management, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Richardson Construction Co. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Richardson Construction Co. averages 2.5 TCR (89% of the Grading construction sites BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Richardson Construction Co. TCR series: 2016=3.9 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=6.2 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Richardson Construction Co. falls in its industry

1,750 Grading construction sites establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 26 Grading construction sites employers in South Carolina.

Richardson Construction Co. (35 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Richardson Construction Co.
Richardson Construction Co. (35 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Richardson Construction Co. has fewer employees than the Grading construction sites median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2023 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2022 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2021 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2020 6.2 6.2 2 0 0
2019 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.9 3.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238910 · SC · Columbia

1,750 Grading construction sites employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 542 employers in Columbia, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Maryland Materials Management, LLC 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tri State Dismantling Corp. 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR NCB-Main 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brubacher Excavating inc. 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Conway Service Center and Warehouse 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE FLORENCE DISTRICT OFFICE 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Power Delivery Operations (Charleston) 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Darlington County Water & Sewer Authority 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palmetto Health Richland 5,949 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prisma Health Richland 4,729 FTE
CITY-NEAR South Carolina Department of Transportation 4,400 FTE
CITY-NEAR SC Department of Transportation 3,864 FTE
NAT-TCR Children's Hospital Colorado - Briargate 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR New Horizons Choate 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR WBASC Wilkes-Barre Service Center 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Knife River Materials - Construction 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE S. R. Sloan - Orwigsburg, PA 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clean Water Plant City of Wyoming 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mechanical Systems 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carson Dermatology 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.