Hospitals, general medical and surgical · Texas

Richardson Methodist Medical Center

Dallas, TX · ~1,389 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Richardson Methodist Medical Center runs at 55% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Hospitals, general medical and surgical workplace, earning a grade B.

Richardson Methodist Medical Center: 4.1 TCR = 55% of Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS 7.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Richardson Methodist Medical Center safety composite

Richardson Methodist Medical Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Richardson Methodist Medical Center held a steady TCR band

Richardson Methodist Medical Center's TCR held near 0.1 from 4.0 in 2016 to 4.1 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.2 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.0 · 2017=4.2 · 2018=4.1 · 2019=4.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Dallas, TX AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 4.1 · 55% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #208/520
  • PHOTO ST. PETERSBURG GENER…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 171 inj
  • SIZE ~1,389 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ST. PETERSBURG GENERAL HOSPITAL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Richardson Methodist Medical Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Richardson Methodist Medical Center averages 4.1 TCR (55% of the Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Richardson Methodist Medical Center TCR series: 2016=4 · 2017=4.2 · 2018=4.1 · 2019=4.1 · BLS 7.5

Where Richardson Methodist Medical Center falls in its industry

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #208 safest of 520 Hospitals, general medical and employers in Texas.

Richardson Methodist Medical Center (1,389 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Richardson Methodist Medical Center
Richardson Methodist Medical Center (1,389 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Richardson Methodist Medical Center has more employees than the Hospitals, general medical and surgical median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 4.1 2.8 46 0 0
2018 4.1 2.5 44 0 0
2017 4.2 2.0 43 0 0
2016 4.0 0.9 38 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · TX · Dallas

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and surgical employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,187 employers in Dallas, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ST. PETERSBURG GENERAL HOSPITAL 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR WIAPP017 ASCENSION NE WI - MERCY CAMPUS 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR WIAPP075 ASCENSION CALUMET HOSPITAL 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Troy Health Center 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE 4701-838 1,389 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jacobs Houston Office 1,390 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alcon - Houston 1,392 FTE
STATE-SIZE T.A.S. Commercial Concrete Construction, LLC 1,385 FTE
CITY-NEAR AECOM DCS (US Operations) 15,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rexel USA, Inc 8,356 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1 CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS 6,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR HDQ - Headquarters 5,764 FTE
NAT-TCR Felton02 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR dow circle 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR FedEx Supply Chain - BD Plainfield 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Azek Building Products 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Liberty Distribution 1,389 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mcincr - Mcb Quantico 1,389 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hilo Medical Center 1,389 FTE
NAT-SIZE North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : BOS7 1,388 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.