Sheltered workshops (i.e., work experience centers) · Ohio

Richland Newhope Industries Longview

Mansfield, OH · ~92 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Richland Newhope Industries Longview runs at 119% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Sheltered workshops (i.e., work experience centers) workplace, earning a grade C.

Richland Newhope Industries Longview: 4.5 TCR = 119% of Sheltered workshops (i.e., work experience centers) BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Richland Newhope Industries Longview safety composite

Richland Newhope Industries Longview scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.3

2022→2024

Richland Newhope Industries Longview injury rate improved

Richland Newhope Industries Longview's TCR fell 8.3 from 10.9 in 2022 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 10.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=10.9 · 2023=0.1 · 2024=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624310 · Mansfield, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.5 · 119% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #49/91
  • PHOTO DSU
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~92 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DSU (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Richland Newhope Industries Longview in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Richland Newhope Industries Longview averages 4.5 TCR (119% of the Sheltered workshops (i.e., work experience centers) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Richland Newhope Industries Longview TCR series: 2022=10.9 · 2023=0.1 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Richland Newhope Industries Longview falls in its industry

1,455 Sheltered workshops (i.e., wor establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #49 safest of 91 Sheltered workshops (i.e., wor employers in Ohio.

Richland Newhope Industries Longview (92 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Richland Newhope Industries Longview
Richland Newhope Industries Longview (92 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Richland Newhope Industries Longview has more employees than the Sheltered workshops (i.e., work experien median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.1 0.0 2 0 0
2022 10.9 10.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624310 · OH · Mansfield

1,455 Sheltered workshops (i.e., work experience centers) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 164 employers in Mansfield, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DSU 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Verland 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Goodwill Industries, South Asheville 40 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR ARC Group Employment Services Inc 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cresco Labs - Yellow Springs 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Layer Site 3 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smoot Construction 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ohio State University 92 FTE
CITY-NEAR MedCentral Hospital 2,732 FTE
CITY-NEAR Newman Technology, Inc 794 FTE
CITY-NEAR Avita Health System Ontario Location 485 FTE
CITY-NEAR Broshco Fabricated Products 468 FTE
NAT-TCR PMG OPCO - Colonial LLC 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Stamford Health 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Mary's of Medford, Inc. dba St. Mary's School 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Russells Technical Products, Inc 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 2a USA Inc 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE National Glass & Metal Co., Inc. 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Indigo Hall 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chem Processing, Inc. 92 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.