Labels, commercial printing (except screen), on a job-order basis · Washington

Richmark Label

Seattle, WA · ~67 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Richmark Label runs at 190% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Labels, commercial printing (except screen), on a job-order basis workplace, earning a grade D.

Richmark Label: 6.3 TCR = 190% of Labels, commercial printing (except screen), on a job-order basis BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Richmark Label safety composite

Richmark Label scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2017→2024

Richmark Label injury rate improved

Richmark Label's TCR fell 2.8 from 4.6 in 2017 to 1.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 11.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.6 · 2018=6.4 · 2020=11.5 · 2021=2.9 · 2023=10.3 · 2024=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Seattle, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.3 · 190% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/14
  • PHOTO FedEX Office Chicago…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FedEX Office Chicago Manufacturing Plan (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Richmark Label in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Richmark Label averages 6.3 TCR (190% of the Labels, commercial printing (except screen), on a job-order basis BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Richmark Label TCR series: 2017=4.6 · 2018=6.4 · 2020=11.5 · 2021=2.9 · 2023=10.3 · 2024=1.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Richmark Label falls in its industry

2,001 Labels, commercial printing (e establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 14 Labels, commercial printing (e employers in Washington.

Richmark Label (67 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Richmark Label
Richmark Label (67 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Richmark Label has fewer employees than the Labels, commercial printing (except scre median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.8 0.0 1 0 0
2023 10.3 0.0 6 0 0
2021 2.9 0.0 2 0 0
2020 11.5 6.6 7 0 0
2018 6.4 1.6 3 1 0
2017 4.6 3.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · WA · Seattle

2,001 Labels, commercial printing (except screen), on a job-order basis employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 1,279 employers in Seattle, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FedEX Office Chicago Manufacturing Plan 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR NAPP Greensboro - 010 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR LPC TX Visual 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Consolidated Printing & Stationery Co., Inc. 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Borton Main Plant 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Black Star Ranch, LLC 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Longview Area 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE MJM Farms LP 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Seattle 32,378 FTE
CITY-NEAR The United States of America 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR Starz Entertainment 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Medical Center - Montlake and NW 11,307 FTE
NAT-TCR Blue Earth County 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Flexfab Horizons International 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR A&E Grinding 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR First Student Inc. 11928 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Northern California Nail Co. Inc. 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Creative Stone, Inc. 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE 606GRR 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dynamic Sealing Technologies, Inc. 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.