Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential · Kentucky

Richmond ADT

Richmond, KY · ~56 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Richmond ADT runs at 102% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential workplace, earning a grade C.

Richmond ADT: 3.9 TCR = 102% of Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Richmond ADT safety composite

Richmond ADT scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2022→2023

Richmond ADT injury rate improved

Richmond ADT's TCR fell 0.4 from 4.1 in 2022 to 3.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=4.1 · 2023=3.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Richmond, KY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.9 · 102% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #10/20
  • PHOTO 31 Brodeur Ave
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 31 Brodeur Ave (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Richmond ADT in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Richmond ADT averages 3.9 TCR (102% of the Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Richmond ADT TCR series: 2022=4.1 · 2023=3.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Richmond ADT falls in its industry

2,261 Intellectual and developmental establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 20 Intellectual and developmental employers in Kentucky.

Richmond ADT (56 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Richmond ADT
Richmond ADT (56 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Richmond ADT has fewer employees than the Intellectual and developmental disabilit median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.7 1.2 3 0 0
2022 4.1 2.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · KY · Richmond

2,261 Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 100 employers in Richmond, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 31 Brodeur Ave 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mosaic Rockford 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bear Creek Services, Inc. 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6443-483515 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sullivan & Cozart, Inc. 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Verst Langley 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pace Contracting LLC 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bluegrass Contracting Corporation 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blue Grass Chem. Demil. 947 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health Richmond 641 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Heath Richmond 604 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chem Demil US KY Richmond KY KY997 539 FTE
NAT-TCR Fluid Connectors : Vero Beach 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR South San Francisco Ca Plant 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Havencrest Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Gilkey Window Company 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE SBG Newco LLC dba Standard Bent Glass 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE 103176 - E360 Bellevue to Redmond 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE General Magnaplate 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE EMS- Cherrywood Pte of Plymout 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.