Single Family Detached New Home Construction · California

Richmond American Homes of Maryland-So California

Irvine, CA · ~34 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Richmond American Homes of Maryland-So California runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Single Family Detached New Home Construction workplace, earning a grade C.

Richmond American Homes of Maryland-So California: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Single Family Detached New Home Construction BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Richmond American Homes of Maryland-So California safety composite

Richmond American Homes of Maryland-So California scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Richmond American Homes of Maryland-So California held a steady TCR band

Richmond American Homes of Maryland-So California's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 0.0 TCR.

2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236115 · Irvine, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/178
  • PHOTO Meritage Homes of Te…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Meritage Homes of Texas - San Antonio Division (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Richmond American Homes of Maryland-So California in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Richmond American Homes of Maryland-So California averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Single Family Detached New Home Construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Richmond American Homes of Maryland-So California TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Richmond American Homes of Maryland-So California falls in its industry

976 Single Family Detached New Hom establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 178 Single Family Detached New Hom employers in California.

Richmond American Homes of Maryland-So California (34 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Richmond American Homes of Maryland-So California
Richmond American Homes of Maryland-So California (34 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Richmond American Homes of Maryland-So California has fewer employees than the Single Family Detached New Home Construc median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236115 · CA · Irvine

976 Single Family Detached New Home Construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 622 employers in Irvine, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Meritage Homes of Texas - San Antonio Division 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR D.R. Horton, Inc. - DFW East 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR General Contractor 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SLSCO 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ardent Mills Yuba City 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Filice Farms, L.P. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alexander Ranch, Inc. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE MFarms 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Irvine 16,029 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-10 4,926 FTE
CITY-NEAR Edwards Lifesciences 4,189 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johnson and Johnson MDD CSS Irvine 3,775 FTE
NAT-TCR Carbro Constructors Corp Main 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Keller Warehouse 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Airborn Inc. Addison 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kinship Pointe Seward 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cherokee Nation Assurance-USAMRMC Fredrick 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Explosive Countermeasures International, Inc. 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Rockville 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Isabella County Road Commission 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.