Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) · Missouri

Richwood Logistics LLC.Prigmore

Joplin, MO · ~75 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Richwood Logistics LLC.Prigmore runs at 106% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) workplace, earning a grade C.

Richwood Logistics LLC.Prigmore: 4.8 TCR = 106% of Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Richwood Logistics LLC.Prigmore safety composite

Richwood Logistics LLC.Prigmore scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 4.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
C 7.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Richwood Logistics LLC.Prigmore: 2.5 → 7.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 7.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.47× in 2024

Richwood Logistics LLC.Prigmore's TCR rose 4.5 from 2.5 in 2023 to 7.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492210 · Joplin, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.8 · 106% of ind

  • DART 7.0 DART
  • RANK #7/29
  • PHOTO Shift Logistix, LLC
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Shift Logistix, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Richwood Logistics LLC.Prigmore in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Richwood Logistics LLC.Prigmore averages 4.8 TCR (106% of the Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Richwood Logistics LLC.Prigmore TCR series: 2023=2.5 · 2024=7 · BLS 4.5

Where Richwood Logistics LLC.Prigmore falls in its industry

1,452 Delivery service (except as pa establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 11.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 29 Delivery service (except as pa employers in Missouri.

Richwood Logistics LLC.Prigmore (75 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Richwood Logistics LLC.Prigmore
Richwood Logistics LLC.Prigmore (75 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8

Richwood Logistics LLC.Prigmore has fewer employees than the Delivery service (except as part of inte median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 11.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.0 7.0 5 0 0
2023 2.5 2.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492210 · MO · Joplin

1,452 Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 203 employers in Joplin, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Shift Logistix, LLC 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR STK 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR A A HUDDLE LLC 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR N Route 2 U 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fairway Construction Co., Inc. 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE McCarthy Washington University East End Expansion 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Big Boy's Steel Erection, Inc. 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE 8150 - 1-MAIN 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR Freeman Health System 3,718 FTE
CITY-NEAR MERCY HOSPITAL JOPLIN 1,561 FTE
CITY-NEAR Marmic Fire & Safety Company Inc. 875 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jasper Products, LLC 782 FTE
NAT-TCR Nuvar West 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Kyodo Yushi Manufacturing Americas LLC 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Brill Seating Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sweet Candy Company 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE RLSC Laundry 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Otis Elevator Company-East Hartford 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heritage Convalescent Center 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tlc Family Care-Fl 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.