Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Minnesota

Ridgeview Place Senior Living

Sauk Rapids, MN · ~57 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
22.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ridgeview Place Senior Living runs at 599% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Ridgeview Place Senior Living: 22.8 TCR = 599% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ridgeview Place Senior Living safety composite

Ridgeview Place Senior Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 22.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.3

2018→2022

Ridgeview Place Senior Living injury rate improved

Ridgeview Place Senior Living's TCR fell 10.3 from 32.1 in 2018 to 21.8 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 32.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=32.1 · 2021=14.4 · 2022=21.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Sauk Rapids, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 22.8 · 599% of ind

  • DART 5.5 DART
  • RANK #234/240
  • PHOTO Aegis of Ventura
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Aegis of Ventura (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Ridgeview Place Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ridgeview Place Senior Living averages 22.8 TCR (599% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ridgeview Place Senior Living TCR series: 2018=32.1 · 2021=14.4 · 2022=21.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Ridgeview Place Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #234 safest of 240 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Ridgeview Place Senior Living (57 employees, TCR 22.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Ridgeview Place Senior Living
Ridgeview Place Senior Living (57 employees, TCR 22.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Ridgeview Place Senior Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 21.8 5.5 2 6 0
2021 14.4 3.6 3 1 0
2018 32.1 8.8 5 6 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MN · Sauk Rapids

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 50 employers in Sauk Rapids, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Aegis of Ventura 22.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Golden Sands 22.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heritage Plaza 22.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chelsea at Bridgewater 22.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Midwest Maintenance & Mechanical, Inc. 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE TCC-Blaine 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Shore Track Services 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aid Electric Corporation 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sauk Rapids-Rice Public Schools 779 FTE
CITY-NEAR J-Berd Mechanical Contractors INC 487 FTE
CITY-NEAR J-Berd Mechanical 386 FTE
CITY-NEAR 320141 - Various Mobile 306 FTE
NAT-TCR Heritage Park Care Center 22.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Oak 80 22.8 TCR
NAT-TCR LQ2006 Orange County Airport 22.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Village of Round Lake 22.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Houston South 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ridgewood 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sebela Pharmaceuticals 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boomers Boca Raton 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.