Air cowls, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing · New York

Rigidized Metals Corp.

Buffalo, NY · ~56 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rigidized Metals Corp. runs at 158% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Air cowls, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Rigidized Metals Corp.: 5.2 TCR = 158% of Air cowls, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rigidized Metals Corp. safety composite

Rigidized Metals Corp. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.5

2016→2024

Rigidized Metals Corp. injury rate improved

Rigidized Metals Corp.'s TCR fell 3.5 from 7.4 in 2016 to 3.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.4 · 2018=7.8 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=5.9 · 2022=6.0 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Buffalo, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.2 · 158% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #35/58
  • PHOTO Wyoming Machine Inc
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wyoming Machine Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Rigidized Metals Corp. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rigidized Metals Corp. averages 5.2 TCR (158% of the Air cowls, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rigidized Metals Corp. TCR series: 2016=7.4 · 2018=7.8 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=5.9 · 2022=6 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=3.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Rigidized Metals Corp. falls in its industry

1,158 Air cowls, sheet metal (except establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #35 safest of 58 Air cowls, sheet metal (except employers in New York.

Rigidized Metals Corp. (56 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Rigidized Metals Corp.
Rigidized Metals Corp. (56 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Rigidized Metals Corp. has fewer employees than the Air cowls, sheet metal (except stampings median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.9 1.9 2 0 0
2023 3.9 0.0 2 0 0
2022 6.0 0.0 3 0 0
2021 5.9 0.0 3 0 0
2020 3.7 3.7 2 0 0
2019 3.4 1.7 2 0 0
2018 7.8 2.6 3 0 0
2016 7.4 3.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · NY · Buffalo

1,158 Air cowls, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 532 employers in Buffalo, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wyoming Machine Inc 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3510_6703 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR United Enertech Corp 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Barrington Manufacturing 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Arthur Kill Power LLC 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE NRG Arthur Kill Power LLC 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Solar Communities Inc. dba SunCommon 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Orsted - New York City 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buffalo General Hospital 3,556 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Hospital of Buffalo 2,379 FTE
CITY-NEAR WNY Independent Living, Inc. 1,988 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kaleida Health Oishei Childrens Hospital 1,765 FTE
NAT-TCR North East MD Yard 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Complete Aluminum General Contractor 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Light Sources, Incorporated 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Superior Gunite 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ingram Readymix, Inc.-Converse #12 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0092 Surprise 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sunshine Ace Hardware-Bonita 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE American & Efird Filament Plant 05 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.