Precision turned product manufacturing · Michigan

Rima Manufacturing Company

Hudson, MI · ~142 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rima Manufacturing Company runs at 217% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Precision turned product manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Rima Manufacturing Company: 7.2 TCR = 217% of Precision turned product manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rima Manufacturing Company safety composite

Rima Manufacturing Company scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2016→2024

Rima Manufacturing Company injury rate improved

Rima Manufacturing Company's TCR fell 2.0 from 6.8 in 2016 to 4.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 11.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.8 · 2017=7.1 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=11.2 · 2021=9.7 · 2022=8.4 · 2023=6.5 · 2024=4.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332721 · Hudson, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.2 · 217% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #42/53
  • PHOTO Curtis Products LLC
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 65 inj
  • SIZE ~142 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Curtis Products LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Rima Manufacturing Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rima Manufacturing Company averages 7.2 TCR (217% of the Precision turned product manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rima Manufacturing Company TCR series: 2016=6.8 · 2017=7.1 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=11.2 · 2021=9.7 · 2022=8.4 · 2023=6.5 · 2024=4.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Rima Manufacturing Company falls in its industry

464 Precision turned product manuf establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 53 Precision turned product manuf employers in Michigan.

Rima Manufacturing Company (142 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Rima Manufacturing Company
Rima Manufacturing Company (142 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Rima Manufacturing Company has more employees than the Precision turned product manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.8 4.8 7 0 0
2023 6.5 5.2 8 2 0
2022 8.4 4.9 11 1 0
2021 9.7 4.5 7 6 0
2019 11.2 6.2 13 5 0
2018 2.8 1.4 3 1 0
2017 7.1 3.9 9 0 0
2016 6.8 2.5 7 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332721 · MI · Hudson

464 Precision turned product manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 7 employers in Hudson, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Curtis Products LLC 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR LUSK QUALITY MACHINE PRODUCTS 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fischer Special Manufacturing 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alco Dexter 7.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE LGC FM Global Energy 142 FTE
STATE-SIZE Moore Electrical Service, Inc. 142 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allied Electric, Inc 142 FTE
STATE-SIZE Butterball Farms, Inc. 142 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hi-Lex Controls (HCIH) 432 FTE
CITY-NEAR HI-LEX Hudson (HCIH) 380 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kecy Metal Technologies 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hudson Dairy, LLC 27 FTE
NAT-TCR Police Department 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR R+L Carriers - KNO 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR City of DeWitt 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR CB Concord Branch 7.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE PaperWorks Packaging Group 142 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arrow Tank and Engineering Company, Inc. 142 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tigard 142 FTE
NAT-SIZE Palmer Office 142 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.