Telecommunications carriers, wired · Arkansas

Ritter Communications - Marked Tree

Marked Tree, AR · ~50 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ritter Communications - Marked Tree runs at 341% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Telecommunications carriers, wired workplace, earning a grade F.

Ritter Communications - Marked Tree: 2.4 TCR = 341% of Telecommunications carriers, wired BLS 0.7 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ritter Communications - Marked Tree safety composite

Ritter Communications - Marked Tree scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2016→2024

Ritter Communications - Marked Tree injury rate improved

Ritter Communications - Marked Tree's TCR fell 2.9 from 5.6 in 2016 to 2.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.6 · 2017=2.2 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 517110 · Marked Tree, AR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.4 · 341% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #5/8
  • PHOTO CLARO / PRT - CAC Po…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CLARO / PRT - CAC Ponce Mall (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Ritter Communications - Marked Tree in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ritter Communications - Marked Tree averages 2.4 TCR (341% of the Telecommunications carriers, wired BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ritter Communications - Marked Tree TCR series: 2016=5.6 · 2017=2.2 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.7 · BLS 0.7

Where Ritter Communications - Marked Tree falls in its industry

537 Telecommunications carriers, w establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 8 Telecommunications carriers, w employers in Arkansas.

Ritter Communications - Marked Tree (50 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 276 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Ritter Communications - Marked Tree
Ritter Communications - Marked Tree (50 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 276 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Ritter Communications - Marked Tree has fewer employees than the Telecommunications carriers, wired median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.3 3.3 2 0 0
2021 1.8 0.0 1 0 0
2020 3.9 1.9 2 0 0
2019 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.2 0.0 1 0 0
2016 5.6 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

517110 · AR · Marked Tree

537 Telecommunications carriers, wired employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 10 employers in Marked Tree, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CLARO / PRT - CAC Ponce Mall 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR ALLO Fiber Nebraska 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR AllCom Global Services Inc 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grande Communications Networks, LLC-San Antonio 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Batesville Operation 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Little Rock Port Arkansas Transformer Shop / Telecom 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harness Roofing HS 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Platinum Roofing, LLC 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Three Rivers Healthcare & Rehabilitation 108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Three Rivers Health and Rehabilitation 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Marked Tree 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sii - Marked Tree 34 FTE
NAT-TCR Mencom Corporation 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Biewer Sawmill Newton 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Pensacola FL Millwork 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Tampa 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0684 Lake Zurich 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Opportunity Center Administration 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brystar Contracting, Inc. 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Public Works 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.