Transformers, electric power, manufacturing · Georgia

Ritz Instrument Transformers, Inc

Lavonia, GA · ~186 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ritz Instrument Transformers, Inc runs at 176% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Transformers, electric power, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Ritz Instrument Transformers, Inc: 5.8 TCR = 176% of Transformers, electric power, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ritz Instrument Transformers, Inc safety composite

Ritz Instrument Transformers, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2016→2024

Ritz Instrument Transformers, Inc injury rate improved

Ritz Instrument Transformers, Inc's TCR fell 2.4 from 4.8 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 12.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.8 · 2017=7.5 · 2018=12.3 · 2019=7.2 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=5.2 · 2024=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335311 · Lavonia, GA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.8 · 176% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #4/4
  • PHOTO Pioneer Transformer …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 67 inj
  • SIZE ~186 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pioneer Transformer Co. (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Ritz Instrument Transformers, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ritz Instrument Transformers, Inc averages 5.8 TCR (176% of the Transformers, electric power, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ritz Instrument Transformers, Inc TCR series: 2016=4.8 · 2017=7.5 · 2018=12.3 · 2019=7.2 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=5.2 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Ritz Instrument Transformers, Inc falls in its industry

141 Transformers, electric power, establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 Transformers, electric power, employers in Georgia.

Ritz Instrument Transformers, Inc (186 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Ritz Instrument Transformers, Inc
Ritz Instrument Transformers, Inc (186 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Ritz Instrument Transformers, Inc has more employees than the Transformers, electric power, manufactur median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 2.3 8 0 0
2023 5.2 4.1 13 1 0
2022 3.5 3.1 8 0 0
2021 3.6 2.1 4 3 0
2019 7.2 5.7 9 1 0
2018 12.3 10.5 13 1 0
2017 7.5 4.7 8 0 0
2016 4.8 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335311 · GA · Lavonia

141 Transformers, electric power, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 36 employers in Lavonia, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pioneer Transformer Co. 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Magnetic Specialties Inc. 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR MK Magnetics, Inc. 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Niagara Power Transformer Corp 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Conaway Electrical Service, Inc. 186 FTE
STATE-SIZE Morgan Truck Body LLC- MGA Rydal 186 FTE
STATE-SIZE CACS GA ATL SUMMIT 2002 186 FTE
STATE-SIZE Store 0451 186 FTE
CITY-NEAR 9711 566 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Sacred Heart Hospital-SMHCS-GA 359 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carry-On Lavonia 329 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sacred Heart 323 FTE
NAT-TCR 10507 Arlington Center 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 10630 Madison Broadway 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Dc Concrete Co 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Wegmans Medford 134 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Grand Rapids Cascade 186 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lobar Associates, Inc. 186 FTE
NAT-SIZE BCN Cascade 186 FTE
NAT-SIZE 10467 Fremont 186 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.