Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

River Fountains of Lodi

Citrus Heights, CA · ~30 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

River Fountains of Lodi runs at 142% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

River Fountains of Lodi: 5.4 TCR = 142% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

River Fountains of Lodi safety composite

River Fountains of Lodi scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

River Fountains of Lodi: 0.0 → 3.6 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 12.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.67× in 2023

River Fountains of Lodi's TCR rose 3.6 from 0.0 in 2017 to 3.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 12.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Citrus Heights, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.4 · 142% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #123/635
  • PHOTO WEL-Life at Papillion
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WEL-Life at Papillion (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

River Fountains of Lodi in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows River Fountains of Lodi averages 5.4 TCR (142% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

River Fountains of Lodi TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=12.6 · 2023=3.6 · BLS 3.8

Where River Fountains of Lodi falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #123 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

River Fountains of Lodi (30 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate River Fountains of Lodi
River Fountains of Lodi (30 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

River Fountains of Lodi has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.6 3.6 1 0 0
2018 12.6 8.4 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Citrus Heights

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 65 employers in Citrus Heights, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WEL-Life at Papillion 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elite Care Oatfield Estates II, LLC 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 60106 SUNRISE OF FAIRFAX VA 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Ocean House 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE BZNUR 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1780 San Juan Rd. 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Charter Oaks 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenfields Turf, Inc. 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR On My Own Independent Living Services - Citrus Heights 433 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3712 347 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3712 330 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0771 - CITRUS HEIGHTS CA WHSE 278 FTE
NAT-TCR Pawnee Station-888 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Quikrete - Mdt 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR AMT Juneau Service Center 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR USM Store #675 (Market Street) 5.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Urbana - Aura Cacia 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Primary Branch 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Abatement Solutions Technologies, Inc. 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA Gymnastics & Supply, Inc. 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.