Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Michigan

River Rouge Power Plant

River Rouge, MI · ~58 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

River Rouge Power Plant runs at 76% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade B.

River Rouge Power Plant: 0.9 TCR = 76% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

River Rouge Power Plant safety composite

River Rouge Power Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2016→2023

River Rouge Power Plant injury rate improved

River Rouge Power Plant's TCR fell 2.7 from 2.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.7 · 2017=3.3 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · River Rouge, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 0.9 · 76% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #10/24
  • PHOTO River Valley Power P…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: River Valley Power Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

River Rouge Power Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows River Rouge Power Plant averages 0.9 TCR (76% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

River Rouge Power Plant TCR series: 2016=2.7 · 2017=3.3 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 1.2

Where River Rouge Power Plant falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 24 Electric power generation, fos employers in Michigan.

River Rouge Power Plant (58 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate River Rouge Power Plant
River Rouge Power Plant (58 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

River Rouge Power Plant has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2017 3.3 2.2 3 0 0
2016 2.7 0.9 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · MI · River Rouge

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 13 employers in River Rouge, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR River Valley Power Plant 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dynegy Moss Landing LLC 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR NRG - T.H. Wharton 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR BL England Generating Station 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Masterpiece Flower Company LLC - Merchandising (WI) 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE NTBS Services 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cherryland Electric Cooperative 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gas Construction Saginaw 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR International Precast Solutions LLC 141 FTE
CITY-NEAR US Gypsum Detroit 99 FTE
CITY-NEAR National Warehouse Management MI 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR Praxair Ecorse, MI 73 FTE
NAT-TCR Gaston Brothers Utilities, LLC 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Monticello 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR BrandSafway Industries, LLC - St. Louis Branch 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Transport Service 60336 Charlotte 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE iConstructors 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Empire Recycling-Utica 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fabrication Associates Inc 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dothan Dirt Cheap 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.