Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors · Texas

Riverbend Crane & Rigging

El Paso, TX · ~36 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Riverbend Crane & Rigging runs at 420% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Riverbend Crane & Rigging: 11.8 TCR = 420% of Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Riverbend Crane & Rigging safety composite

Riverbend Crane & Rigging scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.3

2016→2024

Riverbend Crane & Rigging injury rate improved

Riverbend Crane & Rigging's TCR fell 15.3 from 26.4 in 2016 to 11.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 26.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.94× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=26.4 · 2017=12.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=4.6 · 2021=10.3 · 2022=15.8 · 2023=13.8 · 2024=11.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238120 · El Paso, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.8 · 420% of ind

  • DART 11.1 DART
  • RANK #65/66
  • PHOTO The Erection Company
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Erection Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Riverbend Crane & Rigging in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Riverbend Crane & Rigging averages 11.8 TCR (420% of the Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Riverbend Crane & Rigging TCR series: 2016=26.4 · 2017=12 · 2018=0 · 2019=4.6 · 2021=10.3 · 2022=15.8 · 2023=13.8 · 2024=11.1 · BLS 2.8

Where Riverbend Crane & Rigging falls in its industry

705 Structural steel erecting or i establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #65 safest of 66 Structural steel erecting or i employers in Texas.

Riverbend Crane & Rigging (36 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Riverbend Crane & Rigging
Riverbend Crane & Rigging (36 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Riverbend Crane & Rigging has fewer employees than the Structural steel erecting or iron work c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.1 11.1 3 0 0
2023 13.8 10.4 4 0 0
2022 15.8 9.9 8 0 0
2021 10.3 7.7 4 0 0
2019 4.6 2.3 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 12.0 12.0 4 0 0
2016 26.4 20.5 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238120 · TX · El Paso

705 Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 974 employers in El Paso, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Erection Company 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Walker Rebar Inc 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Ironworks & Erectors, Inc. 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR STEELTECH REINFORCING, INC. 11.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE FRONTIER FEED YARD 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paco Feedyard 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coyote Lake Feedyard Inc. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contract Services Waelder 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - El Paso 2,330 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alegre Home Health Care, LLC EL PASO 1,942 FTE
CITY-NEAR Office of Field Operations - El Paso 1,847 FTE
CITY-NEAR MVT Services, LLC 1,798 FTE
NAT-TCR CMC of Georgia, Inc 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 1116 - NSM Slabtown 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR California Designers Choice Custom Cabinetry 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Alsco Geyer Irrigation, Inc. 11.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Main Office 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE MillTown - Neenah WI 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Office 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE G.A. Peak Excavating, Inc. 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.