Infusion therapy centers and clinics, outpatient · Virginia

Riverside Cancer Infusion Gloucester 5061

Gloucester, VA · ~22 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Riverside Cancer Infusion Gloucester 5061 runs at 50% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Infusion therapy centers and clinics, outpatient workplace, earning a grade A.

Riverside Cancer Infusion Gloucester 5061: 1.9 TCR = 50% of Infusion therapy centers and clinics, outpatient BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Riverside Cancer Infusion Gloucester 5061 safety composite

Riverside Cancer Infusion Gloucester 5061 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Riverside Cancer Infusion Gloucester 5061: 0.0 → 5.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Riverside Cancer Infusion Gloucester 5061's TCR rose 5.7 from 0.0 in 2022 to 5.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621498 · Gloucester, VA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.9 · 50% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/16
  • PHOTO Sapulpa Indian Clinic
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sapulpa Indian Clinic (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Riverside Cancer Infusion Gloucester 5061 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Riverside Cancer Infusion Gloucester 5061 averages 1.9 TCR (50% of the Infusion therapy centers and clinics, outpatient BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Riverside Cancer Infusion Gloucester 5061 TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=5.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Riverside Cancer Infusion Gloucester 5061 falls in its industry

599 Infusion therapy centers and c establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 16 Infusion therapy centers and c employers in Virginia.

Riverside Cancer Infusion Gloucester 5061 (22 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Riverside Cancer Infusion Gloucester 5061
Riverside Cancer Infusion Gloucester 5061 (22 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Riverside Cancer Infusion Gloucester 5061 has fewer employees than the Infusion therapy centers and clinics, ou median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.7 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621498 · VA · Gloucester

599 Infusion therapy centers and clinics, outpatient employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 36 employers in Gloucester, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sapulpa Indian Clinic 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Healthworks 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lorain County Health & Dentistry 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elkhorn City Medical Clinic 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eastville Farm 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE BIRDSONG PEANUTS SOUTHAMPTON 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE L&D Well Service Inc 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Colonial Energy, Inc. 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Walter Reed Hospital 5001 415 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1759 394 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1759 383 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Walter Reed Hospital 362 FTE
NAT-TCR Geary Electric Inc 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #4097 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Reddy Ice - Las Vegas (104) 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Seacrest Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE At Home Stores #141 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pwd Sanitation 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Washington 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pembroke Family Practice 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.