Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Virginia

Riverside Convalescent Center West Point-363

West Point, VA · ~54 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Riverside Convalescent Center West Point-363 runs at 64% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade B.

Riverside Convalescent Center West Point-363: 4.2 TCR = 64% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Riverside Convalescent Center West Point-363 safety composite

Riverside Convalescent Center West Point-363 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Riverside Convalescent Center West Point-363: 4.3 → 8.3 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 8.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.32× in 2019

Riverside Convalescent Center West Point-363's TCR rose 4.0 from 4.3 in 2016 to 8.3 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 1.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · West Point, VA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 4.2 · 64% of ind

  • DART 5.5 DART
  • RANK #98/343
  • PHOTO St James House
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: St James House (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Riverside Convalescent Center West Point-363 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Riverside Convalescent Center West Point-363 averages 4.2 TCR (64% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Riverside Convalescent Center West Point-363 TCR series: 2016=4.3 · 2017=0 · 2019=8.3 · BLS 6.5

Where Riverside Convalescent Center West Point-363 falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #98 safest of 343 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Virginia.

Riverside Convalescent Center West Point-363 (54 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Riverside Convalescent Center West Point-363
Riverside Convalescent Center West Point-363 (54 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Riverside Convalescent Center West Point-363 has fewer employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 8.3 5.5 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.3 2.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · VA · West Point

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 14 employers in West Point, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR St James House 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wellington Place 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Reeds Cove Health & Rehab 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arbor Care Center - Tekamah 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Harrisonburg Headquarters 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE George's Virginia Grow Out 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of Harrisonburg Public Utilities (Operations) 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlantic Builders Office 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR West Point Mill 556 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4510 West Point Mill 542 FTE
CITY-NEAR Curtis Contracting,Inc. 181 FTE
CITY-NEAR 01221 - STORE # 1221 WEST POINT 69 FTE
NAT-TCR Punch-Lok 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR New Paltz Family Health Center 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Ryder / ATT warehouse 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR ICON HEALTH & FITNESS INC Savannah 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Chemung 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Olympus Kennewick 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Anderson 15 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE A J Vater & Co, Inc 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.