Employer · Virginia

Riverside Lifelong Health And Rehabilitation Warwick Forest

Newport News, VA · ~242 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Riverside Lifelong Health And Rehabilitation Warwick Forest runs at 120% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical industry workplace, earning a grade C.

Riverside Lifelong Health And Rehabilitation Warwick Forest: 4.6 TCR = 120% of industry BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Riverside Lifelong Health And Rehabilitation Warwick Forest safety composite

Riverside Lifelong Health And Rehabilitation Warwick Forest scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Riverside Lifelong Health And Rehabilitation Warwick Forest: 4.0 → 5.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.88× in 2024

Riverside Lifelong Health And Rehabilitation Warwick Forest's TCR rose 1.2 from 4.0 in 2023 to 5.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.88× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Newport News, VA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.6 · 120% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #52/199
  • PHOTO Presbyterian Village…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~242 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Presbyterian Villages of Michigan (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Riverside Lifelong Health And Rehabilitation Warwick Forest in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Riverside Lifelong Health And Rehabilitation Warwick Forest averages 4.6 TCR (120% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Riverside Lifelong Health And Rehabilitation Warwick Forest TCR series: 2023=4 · 2024=5.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Riverside Lifelong Health And Rehabilitation Warwick Forest falls in its industry

6,510 industry establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #52 safest of 199 industry employers in Virginia.

Riverside Lifelong Health And Rehabilitation Warwick Forest (242 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Riverside Lifelong Health And Rehabilitation Warwick Forest
Riverside Lifelong Health And Rehabilitation Warwick Forest (242 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Riverside Lifelong Health And Rehabilitation Warwick Forest has more employees than the industry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.1 4.0 9 0 0
2023 4.0 3.4 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · VA · Newport News

6,510 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 330 employers in Newport News, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Presbyterian Villages of Michigan 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Abbotswood at Irving Park 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR LCS Florence LLC 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fig Garden 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hardesty Concrete Construction Inc 242 FTE
STATE-SIZE 029-00540 242 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3480 242 FTE
STATE-SIZE VA-Dupont 242 FTE
CITY-NEAR Newport News Shipbuilding - Division of Huntington Ingalls Industries 24,543 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Regional Medical Center 2,563 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Regional Medical Center-113 1,680 FTE
CITY-NEAR 12490 Jefferson Ave 1,503 FTE
NAT-TCR Greenfield 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR TECHS Inc. 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Mustang 10243 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Star EMS 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE EB Martin Luther Manor 242 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kenyon Industries, Inc. 242 FTE
NAT-SIZE Soho House New York Inc 242 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tradewinds Services, Inc. 242 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.