Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard · California

Riverside

Modesto, CA · ~175 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Riverside runs at 129% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade D.

Riverside: 4.3 TCR = 129% of Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Riverside safety composite

Riverside scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2017→2024

Riverside injury rate improved

Riverside's TCR fell 2.6 from 4.5 in 2017 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.5 · 2018=5.6 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=6.3 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Modesto, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.3 · 129% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #85/111
  • PHOTO CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 53 inj
  • SIZE ~175 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Riverside in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Riverside averages 4.3 TCR (129% of the Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Riverside TCR series: 2017=4.5 · 2018=5.6 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=6.3 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Riverside falls in its industry

1,338 Corrugated and solid fiber box establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #85 safest of 111 Corrugated and solid fiber box employers in California.

Riverside (175 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Riverside
Riverside (175 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Riverside has more employees than the Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made fr median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 1.5 4 0 0
2023 4.2 3.0 7 0 0
2022 5.2 4.5 7 1 0
2021 3.3 3.3 5 0 0
2020 6.3 5.8 10 2 0
2019 3.1 3.1 5 0 0
2018 5.6 4.5 10 0 0
2017 4.5 2.7 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · CA · Modesto

1,338 Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 418 employers in Modesto, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Illinois Valley Container 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Royal Pad Products 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Acme Corrugated Box Co., Inc. 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE SANTA BARBARA FARMS, LLC 175 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bradcon LLC dba: Bradley Concrete 175 FTE
STATE-SIZE Syserco, Inc. 175 FTE
STATE-SIZE CCI:CC023 - CC023 -McClellan Park, CA 175 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Valley Hospitals (30240) 3,153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Modesto Operations 3,043 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4701-930 3,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR 930 DOCTORS MEDICAL CENTER OF MODESTO 2,759 FTE
NAT-TCR Dallas North 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Chicago Midway 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Athlos Leadership Academy 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Weekley Electric, LLC 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Apostolos Group, Inc./dba Thomarios 175 FTE
NAT-SIZE Land O'Lakes - Hicksville, NY 175 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advanced Poly Packaging, Inc. 175 FTE
NAT-SIZE ShopRite Of West Nyack # 288 175 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.