Co-generation plant construction · Wisconsin

Riverside Project

Name: Riverside Project Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Beloit, WI · ~216 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 0.9
Avg TCR: 2.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Riverside Project runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Co-generation plant construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Riverside Project: 0.9 TCR = 32% of Co-generation plant construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Riverside Project safety composite

Riverside Project scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): B 0.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers
DART rate: D 0.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2018→2019

Riverside Project injury rate improved

Riverside Project's TCR fell 0.4 from 1.1 in 2018 to 0.7 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.1 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.38× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.1 · 2019=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Beloit, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 32% of ind

DART 0.3 DART
RANK #3/40
PHOTO Perham, MN (Arvig)
BOOK 2y book
INJ 5 inj
SIZE ~216 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Perham, MN (Arvig) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

This site

0.9
Perham, MN (Ar

0.9
Colorado C & I

0.9
PTI

0.9
Rush Creek Win

0.9

What this shows Riverside Project averages 0.9 TCR (32% of the Co-generation plant construction BLS benchmark).

Riverside Project TCR series: 2018=1.1 · 2019=0.7 · BLS 2.8

Where Riverside Project falls in its industry

1,605 Co-generation plant constructi establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 40 Co-generation plant constructi employers in Wisconsin.

Riverside Project (216 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Riverside Project has more employees than the Co-generation plant construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2019	0.7	0.3	2	0	0
2018	1.1	0.4	3	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · WI · Beloit

1,605 Co-generation plant construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 110 employers in Beloit, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Perham, MN (Arvig)	PERHAM, MN	0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Colorado C & I	HENDERSON, CO	0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR	PTI	WOODLAND, WA	0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Rush Creek Wind 16141016	MATHESON, CO	0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Impact Confections	JANESVILLE	216 FTE
STATE-SIZE	G&O Fredonia	FREDONIA	216 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Eck Industries	MANITOWOC	216 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Enlight Group II LLC	MANITOWOC	216 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Amazon.com Services LLC - JVL1	Beloit	1,309 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Beloit Health System	Beloit	1,206 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Kerry Ingredients	Beloit	944 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Kerry Beloit	Beloit	938 FTE
NAT-TCR	NWNA - Poland Spring Bottling Hollis	Hollis, ME	0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR	Chris Nolan	Memphis, TN	0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR	Ken-Mac Metal - Cleveland	Middleburg Heights, OH	0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR	Daybreak Foods, Inc.	Long Prairie, MN	0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Protein Simple	San Jose, CA	216 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Colt Builders Corp.	Salt Lake City, UT	216 FTE
NAT-SIZE	JE Berkowitz	Pedricktown, NJ	216 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Marlborough Hills MA SNF LLC	Marlborough, MA	216 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.