Bars, concrete reinforcing (rebar), made from purchased steel in steel rolling mills · California

Riverside Steel, Inc.

Lake Elsinore, CA · ~201 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Riverside Steel, Inc. runs at 192% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Bars, concrete reinforcing (rebar), made from purchased steel in steel rolling mills workplace, earning a grade D.

Riverside Steel, Inc.: 6.3 TCR = 192% of Bars, concrete reinforcing (rebar), made from purchased steel in steel rolling mills BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Riverside Steel, Inc. safety composite

Riverside Steel, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Riverside Steel, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Riverside Steel, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.3 from 6.8 in 2017 to 6.5 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.8 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.8 · 2018=6.0 · 2019=5.9 · 2020=6.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331221 · Lake Elsinore, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.3 · 192% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #9/12
  • PHOTO Kenwal Steel - TN, LLC
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~201 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kenwal Steel - TN, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Riverside Steel, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Riverside Steel, Inc. averages 6.3 TCR (192% of the Bars, concrete reinforcing (rebar), made from purchased steel in steel rolling mills BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Riverside Steel, Inc. TCR series: 2017=6.8 · 2018=6 · 2019=5.9 · 2020=6.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Riverside Steel, Inc. falls in its industry

206 Bars, concrete reinforcing (re establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 12 Bars, concrete reinforcing (re employers in California.

Riverside Steel, Inc. (201 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Riverside Steel, Inc.
Riverside Steel, Inc. (201 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Riverside Steel, Inc. has more employees than the Bars, concrete reinforcing (rebar), made median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 6.5 2.9 9 0 0
2019 5.9 4.7 5 0 0
2018 6.0 6.0 6 0 0
2017 6.8 1.7 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331221 · CA · Lake Elsinore

206 Bars, concrete reinforcing (rebar), made from purchased steel in steel rolling mills employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 57 employers in Lake Elsinore, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kenwal Steel - TN, LLC 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jemison Metals SMT 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4504 - Valley Steel Plant 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ratner Steel Minnesota 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Harris Ranch Feeding Company 201 FTE
STATE-SIZE MALAGA BUILDING D 201 FTE
STATE-SIZE AM Ortega Construction Inc. 201 FTE
STATE-SIZE 103171 - Huntington Beach Energy Project 201 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lake Elsinore Unified School District 2,567 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 497 1,679 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-064 908 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2077 354 FTE
NAT-TCR Ross store 86 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Southport Truck Group-Fort Myers 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 441 South Attleboro, Ma 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR CO066 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE PotlatchDeltic: WARREN 201 FTE
NAT-SIZE Henry Ford Cottage Hospital 201 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aztec Events & Tents 201 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arizona Office 201 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.