Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Louisiana

Riverview Care Center

Bossier City, LA · ~116 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Riverview Care Center runs at 74% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade B.

Riverview Care Center: 4.8 TCR = 74% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Riverview Care Center safety composite

Riverview Care Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.4

2016→2024

Riverview Care Center injury rate improved

Riverview Care Center's TCR fell 5.4 from 7.3 in 2016 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 10.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.3 · 2017=3.9 · 2019=2.0 · 2021=10.7 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Bossier City, LA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 4.8 · 74% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #211/314
  • PHOTO Shasta View Estates
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~116 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Shasta View Estates (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

Riverview Care Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Riverview Care Center averages 4.8 TCR (74% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Riverview Care Center TCR series: 2016=7.3 · 2017=3.9 · 2019=2 · 2021=10.7 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 6.5

Where Riverview Care Center falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #211 safest of 314 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Louisiana.

Riverview Care Center (116 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Riverview Care Center
Riverview Care Center (116 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Riverview Care Center has more employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 1.9 2 0 0
2023 4.1 4.1 1 0 0
2022 3.8 2.5 3 0 0
2021 10.7 10.7 1 9 0
2019 2.0 2.0 2 0 0
2017 3.9 3.9 3 1 0
2016 7.3 7.3 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · LA · Bossier City

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 118 employers in Bossier City, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Shasta View Estates 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Granada Hills Convelescent Hospital 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Isles of Boynton Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Benton House of Covington 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE 4054-ABS-0020-0022-03792 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Store #643 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unit # 2753 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Omega Protein 116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Willis-Knighton Bossier Health Center 1,209 FTE
CITY-NEAR HORSESHOE BOSSIER CITY HOTEL & CASINO 894 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brookdale Bossier 755 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0083-HES Bossier City LA Industrial 606 FTE
NAT-TCR 05-CACTUS 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Broadridge Customer Communications 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR FabLite 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Benton House of Covington 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ammons & Blackmon Construction, LLC 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Creighton Univ Brandeis 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE JK Johnson Mechanical Contractors 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Closure Systems International Americas, Inc. 116 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.