Skilled nursing facilities · Georgia

Riverview Health and Rehabilitation

Savannah, GA · ~178 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Riverview Health and Rehabilitation runs at 234% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Riverview Health and Rehabilitation: 15.2 TCR = 234% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Riverview Health and Rehabilitation safety composite

Riverview Health and Rehabilitation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 22.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Riverview Health and Rehabilitation: 8.1 → 25.9 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 26.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.46× in 2023

Riverview Health and Rehabilitation's TCR rose 17.7 from 8.1 in 2016 to 25.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 26.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Savannah, GA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 15.2 · 234% of ind

  • DART 22.3 DART
  • RANK #201/259
  • PHOTO Ms Care Center of De…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~178 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ms Care Center of Dekalb (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Riverview Health and Rehabilitation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Riverview Health and Rehabilitation averages 15.2 TCR (234% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Riverview Health and Rehabilitation TCR series: 2016=8.1 · 2021=0.3 · 2022=26.6 · 2023=25.9 · BLS 6.5

Where Riverview Health and Rehabilitation falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #201 safest of 259 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Georgia.

Riverview Health and Rehabilitation (178 employees, TCR 15.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Riverview Health and Rehabilitation
Riverview Health and Rehabilitation (178 employees, TCR 15.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Riverview Health and Rehabilitation has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 25.9 22.3 6 30 0
2022 26.6 25.3 8 32 0
2021 0.3 0.3 11 38 0
2016 8.1 5.6 16 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · GA · Savannah

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 511 employers in Savannah, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ms Care Center of Dekalb 15.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Peak Resources-Charlotte 15.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR St. Perer's Health Partners/Our Lady of Mercy Life Center 15.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Homewood Center 15.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sales Group 178 FTE
STATE-SIZE TI Fluid Systems 178 FTE
STATE-SIZE L492-Curry Honda 178 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1116 LOWE S OF S.W. AUGUSTA GA. 178 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gulfstream Aerospace 13,245 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Health University Medical Center 3,186 FTE
CITY-NEAR Savannah College of Art and Design 2,369 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Health University Medical 2,056 FTE
NAT-TCR Vitalant TX Midland 15.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Verde Farms LLC 15.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Best Western Plus Truckee-Tahoe Hotel 15.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Talisman Construction Services, LLC. 15.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE dormakaba_Reamstown 178 FTE
NAT-SIZE NGK Spark Plugs (U.S.A.), Inc. 178 FTE
NAT-SIZE Visalia #061 178 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Village at Gleannloch Farms 178 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.