General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) · Illinois

R+L Carriers - MKH

Markham, IL · ~114 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

R+L Carriers - MKH runs at 170% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) workplace, earning a grade D.

R+L Carriers - MKH: 7.7 TCR = 170% of General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

R+L Carriers - MKH safety composite

R+L Carriers - MKH scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2016→2022

R+L Carriers - MKH injury rate improved

R+L Carriers - MKH's TCR fell 2.1 from 8.7 in 2016 to 6.5 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 10.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.86× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.7 · 2017=6.5 · 2018=9.4 · 2019=10.1 · 2020=6.1 · 2021=6.3 · 2022=6.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484122 · Markham, IL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.7 · 170% of ind

  • DART 6.5 DART
  • RANK #112/177
  • PHOTO 031 Los Angeles
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 70 inj
  • SIZE ~114 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 031 Los Angeles (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

R+L Carriers - MKH in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows R+L Carriers - MKH averages 7.7 TCR (170% of the General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

R+L Carriers - MKH TCR series: 2016=8.7 · 2017=6.5 · 2018=9.4 · 2019=10.1 · 2020=6.1 · 2021=6.3 · 2022=6.5 · BLS 4.5

Where R+L Carriers - MKH falls in its industry

3,020 General freight trucking, long establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #112 safest of 177 General freight trucking, long employers in Illinois.

R+L Carriers - MKH (114 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate R+L Carriers - MKH
R+L Carriers - MKH (114 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6

R+L Carriers - MKH has more employees than the General freight trucking, long-distance, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 6.5 6.5 9 0 0
2021 6.3 3.7 12 0 0
2020 6.1 5.4 9 0 0
2019 10.1 9.3 13 0 0
2018 9.4 9.4 12 0 0
2017 6.5 5.6 7 0 1
2016 8.7 7.6 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484122 · IL · Markham

3,020 General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 22 employers in Markham, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 031 Los Angeles 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Central Transport of Ohio - 442 442SH 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR POR 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hagerstown MD FXFE-HGR 7.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wyffels Hybrids Production 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dynegy Collinsville Office 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Pioneer Park 114 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - IGQ1 2,441 FTE
CITY-NEAR STA-Markham (MDW-210) 130 FTE
CITY-NEAR Reyes Group Ltd 123 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Markham 122 FTE
NAT-TCR 041 Texas Health Specialty Hospital Fort Worth 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Eagle Wolfington Leasing Corporation 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR HG680 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR HG663 7.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE City Hall 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE ISD 742 Madison Elementary 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sharonville 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society 114 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.