Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building · California

RLH Fire Protection

Bakersfield, CA · ~138 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

RLH Fire Protection runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade B.

RLH Fire Protection: 1.9 TCR = 66% of Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

RLH Fire Protection safety composite

RLH Fire Protection scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.5

2019→2023

RLH Fire Protection injury rate improved

RLH Fire Protection's TCR fell 3.5 from 5.0 in 2019 to 1.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=5.0 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=1.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Bakersfield, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 66% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #194/486
  • PHOTO Shields Construction…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~138 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Shields Construction Company, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

RLH Fire Protection in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows RLH Fire Protection averages 1.9 TCR (66% of the Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

RLH Fire Protection TCR series: 2019=5 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=1 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.6 · BLS 2.9

Where RLH Fire Protection falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #194 safest of 486 Addition, alteration and renov employers in California.

RLH Fire Protection (138 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate RLH Fire Protection
RLH Fire Protection (138 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

RLH Fire Protection has more employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation, com median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.6 0.5 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2020 1.9 1.9 2 0 0
2019 5.0 2.0 3 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · CA · Bakersfield

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 818 employers in Bakersfield, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Shields Construction Company, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arminco Inc 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vincit Consulting Services, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ingle-Barr Inc 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Westerlay Orchids LP 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE Danell Custom Harvesting LLC - DCH629 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sustainable Labor Solutions, Inc 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE In-N-Out Burger Maintenance Group 138 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA Bakersfield 4,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-04 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BFL1 4,113 FTE
CITY-NEAR Esparza Enterprises, Inc 3,267 FTE
NAT-TCR Nashua Store 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Upchurch Industrial, LLC 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Facility 1 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR J & C Enterprises, Incorporated dba Two Men and A Truck 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nappa Home Office 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manor at Elfindale 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Micronutrients USA, LLC 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roberts Tours and Transportation Inc, Hilo and Kona 138 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.